2019
DOI: 10.4324/9780429287657
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

IBM SPSS for Introductory Statistics: Use and Interpretation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
400
0
52

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 323 publications
(455 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
400
0
52
Order By: Relevance
“…The data were analyzed using Statistical Packages for Social Sciences (SPSS) software packages version 20.0 (Morgan et al, 2004). To compare the differences between the wealth group livestock holding, nutrient requirement and methane emission rates: one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data were analyzed using Statistical Packages for Social Sciences (SPSS) software packages version 20.0 (Morgan et al, 2004). To compare the differences between the wealth group livestock holding, nutrient requirement and methane emission rates: one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reliability is when measurement is consistent and means that the survey instrument and the results are the same for the first and second tests (Creswell, 2009). It is important to assess the reliability of data prior to conducting inferential statistics to help answer research questions (Morgan et al, 2013). Reliability refers to the consistency and stability of the scores obtained through measurements (Creswell, 2012).…”
Section: Phase 3: Testing For Validity and Reliabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most authors neglect the issue of appropriateness of different measures of ES for different research designs. The vast majority of texts only mention d or r. There are of course exceptions; for example Morgan et al (2013) provide an excellent and lengthy account of the relevant issues. One reason for the neglect may be the fact that there is no consensus on this issue (Levin & Robinson, 1999).…”
Section: What Are the Appropriate Indices Of Es?mentioning
confidence: 99%