2022
DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(21)00638-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ibrutinib–rituximab followed by R-HCVAD as frontline treatment for young patients (≤65 years) with mantle cell lymphoma (WINDOW-1): a single-arm, phase 2 trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7 To minimize the exposure to chemotherapy, and resulting toxicity, WINDOW-1 regimen was reported. 119 Induction with rituximab another in North America, 122 the BR combination has become the standard first-line treatment for elderly MCL patients. In 2013,…”
Section: Prognostic Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…7 To minimize the exposure to chemotherapy, and resulting toxicity, WINDOW-1 regimen was reported. 119 Induction with rituximab another in North America, 122 the BR combination has become the standard first-line treatment for elderly MCL patients. In 2013,…”
Section: Prognostic Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To minimize the exposure to chemotherapy, and resulting toxicity, WINDOW‐1 regimen was reported 119 . Induction with rituximab (IR) (Part A) followed by short‐course four cycles of R‐HCVAD‐methotrexate/ara‐C (Part B) was investigated in 131 patients in a single‐arm phase 2 clinical trial.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…39 Several phase II, single-arm studies have demonstrated impressive results with ASCT consolidation after intensive induction, reporting 4-5 year PFS and OS rates of 56%-73% and 64%-81% respectively (Table 2). 33,39,40,[44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53] A previous EMCLN randomised prospective trial compared ASCT to interferon-α maintenance after CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisolone)-like induction with or without rituximab. 54 With 14 years follow-up, there was significantly superior PFS and OS in the ASCT group; however, on subgroup analysis the difference in both PFS and OS was restricted only to rituximab-naïve patients.…”
Section: Intensive Chemoimmunotherapy and Autologous Stem Cell Transp...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For patients eligible for intensive chemotherapy and ASCT, the recent WINDOW-1 single-centre phase II study recently reported results with the use of front-line IR, prior to chemoimmunotherapy. 45 IR was given for up to 12 cycles, followed by four cycles of R-HCVAD (rituximab/cyclophosphamide/vincristine/doxorubicin/dexamethasone) in those with CR or a more intensive combination of R-HCVAD with methotrexate-cytarabine in those not in CR. Although the responses from IR alone (98% ORR) were promising and raise the question of whether chemotherapy is needed at all in the front-line setting, patients with TP53 mutations and/ or blastoid morphology had a lower CR rate compared to those without (Table 2).…”
Section: Novel and Cellular Therapies In Front-linementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that the efficacy of this combination may be reduced in the context of TP53-mutation and Ki-67 high expression [ 171 , 237 ]. Ibrutinib–rituximab induction followed by shortened R-HCVAD CIT regime induced an extremely high rate of overall response (98%) as frontline treatment in young MCL patients, with reduced chemotherapy-related AEs [ 172 ]. The addition of bendamustine [ 238 ] or lenalidomide [ 175 ] into the ibrutinib–rituximab regime showed promising activity and tolerability.…”
Section: Btk Inhibitors In Hematological Malignanciesmentioning
confidence: 99%