2007
DOI: 10.1049/iet-epa:20060174
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ICCG method applied to solve DC traction load flow including earthing models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
28
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The return circuit is a distributed parameter model, which is always divided into segments of 100-300 m in the simulation, and the segment is equivalent to a lumped parameter model. In the simulation of the whole line, the conductance matrixes of multiple segments will be very large, and the speed of the calculation will be slow [23]. In this paper, the return circuit between the train and traction substation is simulated with a π circuit, and the parameters are modified by a distributed parameter model to ensure the accuracy and speed of the simulation [24].…”
Section: System Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The return circuit is a distributed parameter model, which is always divided into segments of 100-300 m in the simulation, and the segment is equivalent to a lumped parameter model. In the simulation of the whole line, the conductance matrixes of multiple segments will be very large, and the speed of the calculation will be slow [23]. In this paper, the return circuit between the train and traction substation is simulated with a π circuit, and the parameters are modified by a distributed parameter model to ensure the accuracy and speed of the simulation [24].…”
Section: System Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of these works consider the DC system and also the AC system feeding the DC one [1], [2], [5]- [8] and others consider only the DC subsystem [4], [9]. The former provide a more accurate solution because the effect of the AC subsystem is considered, but the latter are faster, and for most applications they have enough accuracy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The former provide a more accurate solution because the effect of the AC subsystem is considered, but the latter are faster, and for most applications they have enough accuracy. As it is stated in [4], some of these works solve the system of equations using direct approaches based on Gaussian elimination, Cholesky decomposition or Zollenkopf bifactorisation considering that DC substations are DC voltage or current sources [? ], [4], [9] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the literature [11][12][13][14] and also proof by simulation experiences, the current injection method or alternatively current-vector iterative method (CIM) is more efficient than any others. However, for a large-scale DC power network, several hundred nodes or up to a thousand nodes, incomplete Cholesky conjugate gradient (ICCG) method [15] to handle large sparse matrices is preferred.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%