2019 International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition (ICDAR) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/icdar.2019.00248
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ICDAR 2019 Time-Quality Binarization Competition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 34 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since there is no single binarization method that would be perfect for all applications for document images, some initial attempts at the combination of widely known approaches have been made [6], although verified for a relatively small number of test images from earlier DIBCO datasets. Another interesting recent idea is the development of some methods, which should be balanced between the processing time and obtained accuracy, presented during the ICDAR 2019 Time-Quality Document Binarization Competition [7]. Some approaches presented during this competition were also based on the combination of multiple methods, e.g., based on supervised machine learning, including texture features, with the use of the XGBoost classifier and additional morphological post-processing, as well as, e.g., a combination of the Niblack [8] and Wolf [9] methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since there is no single binarization method that would be perfect for all applications for document images, some initial attempts at the combination of widely known approaches have been made [6], although verified for a relatively small number of test images from earlier DIBCO datasets. Another interesting recent idea is the development of some methods, which should be balanced between the processing time and obtained accuracy, presented during the ICDAR 2019 Time-Quality Document Binarization Competition [7]. Some approaches presented during this competition were also based on the combination of multiple methods, e.g., based on supervised machine learning, including texture features, with the use of the XGBoost classifier and additional morphological post-processing, as well as, e.g., a combination of the Niblack [8] and Wolf [9] methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%