2001
DOI: 10.3189/172756501781832485
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ice-divide flow at Hans Tausen Iskappe, North Greenland, from surface movement data

Abstract: ABSTRACT. Surface strain rates around the southeastern dome of Hans Tausen Iskappe in Peary Land, North Greenland (82.5³ N, 27.5³ W), are determined from global positioning system surveys of a strain net. Average longitudinal surface strain rate increases towards the dome, from (1.4 AE 0.2)610^4 a^1 at 5^10 ice thicknesses from the divide to (2.4 AE1.0)610^4 a^1 within 1 ice thickness from the divide. Analysis of the data shows that the ice cap is presently building up within the strain net with an average rat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…8a). These values are in agreement with the surface velocities derived from the mass balance stakes on Hare glacier (Thomsen et al, 1996) and a strain network setup around the central dome (Hvidberg et al, 2001). The InSAR velocities are consistent with the 1947-1978 average surface velocities deduced from aerial photography (Higgins, 1990), although direct comparisons are not always straightforward as the exact location of the aerial measurement is often not clearly stated (see Joughin et al, 2010, for an elaborate discussion).…”
Section: Site Description and Field Datasupporting
confidence: 73%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…8a). These values are in agreement with the surface velocities derived from the mass balance stakes on Hare glacier (Thomsen et al, 1996) and a strain network setup around the central dome (Hvidberg et al, 2001). The InSAR velocities are consistent with the 1947-1978 average surface velocities deduced from aerial photography (Higgins, 1990), although direct comparisons are not always straightforward as the exact location of the aerial measurement is often not clearly stated (see Joughin et al, 2010, for an elaborate discussion).…”
Section: Site Description and Field Datasupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Huybrechts, 1996, for a more detailed account). Surface temperature is calculated from the mean annual temperature (TMA) and a warming component related to the superimposed ice formation.…”
Section: Thermodynamics and Role Of Meltwatermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…the walls of the tube are vertical), which may depend on the surface geometry. Furthermore, the error in the computation of R is only discussed by Hvidberg et al (1997b), who estimated the error in the calculation of R to be 15 %, and Hvidberg et al (2001) by about 50 %. The method used to measure R is not detailed either, and we doubt that its influence is negligible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%