2010 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium 2010
DOI: 10.1109/igarss.2010.5650201
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Icesat lidar and global digital elevation models: applications to desdyni

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many criteria have been adopted when selecting GLAS data as control points (Huber et al., ; Carabajal et al., ; Gonzalez et al., ). In this study, GLAS data was chosen by the received waveform from GLA01 and the fitting parameters from GLA14, such as the number of Gaussian functions N p and the fitting standard deviation σ m .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many criteria have been adopted when selecting GLAS data as control points (Huber et al., ; Carabajal et al., ; Gonzalez et al., ). In this study, GLAS data was chosen by the received waveform from GLA01 and the fitting parameters from GLA14, such as the number of Gaussian functions N p and the fitting standard deviation σ m .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where w(t) is the amplitude of a GLAS waveform at time t; N p is the number of Gaussian functions identified in the GLAS waveform, which is correlated with the complexity of terrain or vegetation in the footprint; W m is the mth Gaussian function; A m is the amplitude of the mth Gaussian function; ɛ is the bias (or noise level) of the waveform; and t m and r m are the peak position and standard deviation of the mth Gaussian function, respectively. Many criteria have been adopted when selecting GLAS data as control points (Huber et al, 2009;Carabajal et al, 2010;Gonzalez et al, 2010). In this study, GLAS data was chosen by the received waveform from GLA01 and the fitting parameters from GLA14, such as the number of Gaussian functions N p and the fitting standard deviation r m .…”
Section: Derivation Of the Height Control Points From Glas Full Waveformmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These criteria have been documented in Carabajal et al (2010 and. We select waveforms with widths from signal start to end of less than 5 m, indicating the within-footprint relief is low.…”
Section: Icesat Data As Geodetic Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This database of ICESat GCPs have been previously used to characterize and quantify spatially varying elevation biases in Digital Elevation Models (DEMs), assessing the accuracy of valuable topographic datasets like GMTED2010 (Global Multiresolution Terrain Elevation Data), developed by the USGS (United States Geological Survey) and NGA (National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency), and previously those produced by sensors like the Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) Carabajal et al, 2010), and the Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer (ASTER) (ASTER Validation Team 2009 and. In this study, we have analysed the error statistics for the latest version of ASTER Global Digital Elevation Map GDEM V3.…”
Section: Icesat Data As Geodetic Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spaceborne LFL is attractive to scientists and policy makers because of its ability to measure forest biomass at the global scale. ICESat 2 is currently being planned for launch in early 2016, and next generation spaceborne lidar systems will have smaller footprint size and increased density of measurements on the ground [14,15].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%