1999
DOI: 10.1016/s1383-5742(99)00004-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ICH-Harmonised guidances on genotoxicity testing of pharmaceuticals: evolution, reasoning and impact

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
62
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 154 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the determination of the potential mutagenic effect of any drug under development is mandatory [55]. The Ames assay, which is recommended for testing the mutagenicity of chemical compounds with potential pharmacological application [56] was used in the present study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the determination of the potential mutagenic effect of any drug under development is mandatory [55]. The Ames assay, which is recommended for testing the mutagenicity of chemical compounds with potential pharmacological application [56] was used in the present study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it should be considered that efforts to develop and refine methods for genotoxicity and carcinogenicity testing of pharmaceuticals started approximately 20 years ago, and current guidelines were published in 1996-97 [1][2][3][4][5].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Tata et al [16], there is some evidence of a modest increase in congenital malformations in children born to women with asthma, but this was not explained by gestational exposure to asthma drugs. No data are available [14] to evaluate the carcinogenicity to human Drugs with at least one result in tests for gene mutation in mammalian cells (3,5,8,9,10,11,14,17,18,19,20) 11 (23.9%) Drugs with at least one result in in vitro tests for SCE, chromosomal aberrations, aneuploidy or micronucleus in animal or human cells (1,3,4,5,7,8,10,11,13,14,15,17,18,19,20,21) 16 (34.8%)…”
Section: Epidemiological Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1 Due to the complexity and high cost of long-term animal studies, early judgments about a compound's genotoxicity are made on the basis of results from a battery of regulatory tests. 2 Currently, 3 tests are required, which include a Salmonella bacterial reversion assay (Ames), an in vitro assessment of chromosomal damage in mammalian cells (metaphase chromosome aberration test or in vitro micronucleus test) or an in vitro mouse lymphoma L5178Y thymidine kinase mutation assay (MLA), and an in vivo assessment of chromosome damage using rodent hematopoietic cells (International Conference on Harmonisation [ICH] guideline S2(B)). An additional in vivo assessment is required when there are positive in vitro data.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%