2021
DOI: 10.1016/s2213-2600(21)00134-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Icotinib versus chemotherapy as adjuvant treatment for stage II–IIIA EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer (EVIDENCE): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
106
1
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(115 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
6
106
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“… 20 A study 21 has shown that gefitinib can effectively inhibit a variety of tumor cell lines xenografted in nude mice and can also improve the antitumor effects of chemotherapy and radiotherapy. The clinical study of He et al 22 showed that these patients were significantly and effectively treated with gefitinib, and the disease-related symptoms were significantly improved, which improves the quality of life. However, drug resistance is also predictable in long-term use.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“… 20 A study 21 has shown that gefitinib can effectively inhibit a variety of tumor cell lines xenografted in nude mice and can also improve the antitumor effects of chemotherapy and radiotherapy. The clinical study of He et al 22 showed that these patients were significantly and effectively treated with gefitinib, and the disease-related symptoms were significantly improved, which improves the quality of life. However, drug resistance is also predictable in long-term use.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…It was worth noted that the DFS was prolonged with statistically significant in patients with EGFR mutations in RADIANT trial [ 20 ]. Moreover, the recent studies of ADAURA and EVIDENCE showed that adjuvant osimertinib or icotinib could provide significant survival benefits against placebo or adjuvant chemotherapy in NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations [ 23 , 24 ]. The reasons for the contradictory results might be caused, at least in part, by that as follows: (1) there was apparent inconsistency in clinical stage; (2) the percentages of EGFR mutations were different, which varied from 4% in BR19 to 100% in most of studies; (3) different generation of EGFR-TKIs was chosen as intervention therapies; (4) the duration of EGFR-TKIs was non-uniform.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas only osimertinib is recommended historically initially as a considerable adjuvant treatment followed adjuvant chemotherapy by NCCN guideline, and none of the other EGFR-TKIs are recommended by guideline [ 29 ]. The reason might be that although the DFS benefits of first generation of EGFR-TKIs were significant in EVIDENCE, ADJUVANT, EVAN and other studies, the DFS advantage associated with adjuvant icotinib, gefitinib and erlotinib did not translate into a significant OS improvement [ 21 , 22 , 24 ]. However, in ADAURA study, the median DFS was not reached in adjuvant osimertinib versus 27.5 months in placebo group [ 23 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This approval was based on the results from EVIDENCE trial, in which icotinib showed an improved median DFS of 46.9 months compared with 22.1 months in standard chemotherapy group. 110 Icotinib is now under evaluation by the U.S. FDA for the treatment of EGFR mutation‐positive NSCLC patients.…”
Section: Targeted Therapy For Nsclcmentioning
confidence: 99%