2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2011.05.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ideal Vial Size for Bortezomib: Real-World Data on Waste and Cost Reduction in Treatment of Multiple Myeloma in Brazil

Abstract: A simple adjustment in vial size may reduce the waste of bortezomib by 36% to 62% and can also reduce the cost of treatment.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A retrospective study of bortezomib usage in Brazil showed that the average dose was 2.1 mg, and this resulted in 39.5% of the vial being wasted. 16 The authors also showed that alternative vial sizes for bortezomib could reduce wastage by 62%. In our analysis, the average dose was 2.28 mg per infusion, and this resulted in 35.0% of the vial being wasted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A retrospective study of bortezomib usage in Brazil showed that the average dose was 2.1 mg, and this resulted in 39.5% of the vial being wasted. 16 The authors also showed that alternative vial sizes for bortezomib could reduce wastage by 62%. In our analysis, the average dose was 2.28 mg per infusion, and this resulted in 35.0% of the vial being wasted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…They estimated that 27% to 30% of bortezomib sales in the United States are associated with wasted drug. A retrospective study of bortezomib usage in Brazil showed that the average dose was 2.1 mg, and this resulted in 39.5% of the vial being wasted . The authors also showed that alternative vial sizes for bortezomib could reduce wastage by 62%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clark et al 3 was able to show that if bortezomib was changed from a presentation of 3.5 mg to being available as 2.5 mg and 0.5 mg, that wastage could be reduced by up to 62%. Unfortunately, the ability to realise these savings is outside the control of compounding units, but this will hopefully form a large part of procurement decisions when it comes to the wider generics market.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some other strategies proposed to reduce cancer treatment expenditures using the rational application of personalized dose principle, dose rounding to the nearest vial size 5,6 , dose standardization 7 of anticancer drugs and, selecting the most convenient vial size 8 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%