2017
DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226507194.001.0001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Idealization and the Aims of Science

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
288
0
8

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 330 publications
(298 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
2
288
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…The causal complexity of the world means that these explanations must rely on representations that not only leave out most features but also misrepresent others (Cartwright, 1983;Potochnik, 2017;Strevens, 2008). Natural phenomena are produced by such a diversity of causes that it would be impossible to refer to them all.…”
Section: Explanationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The causal complexity of the world means that these explanations must rely on representations that not only leave out most features but also misrepresent others (Cartwright, 1983;Potochnik, 2017;Strevens, 2008). Natural phenomena are produced by such a diversity of causes that it would be impossible to refer to them all.…”
Section: Explanationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, even if we could, this would merely be a description. This makes it possible to foresee what would have happened if things would have been different, and thereby grasp how features of the world are connected (Potochnik, 2017). The causal complexity of the world means that these explanations must rely on representations that not only leave out most features but also misrepresent others (Cartwright, 1983;Potochnik, 2017;Strevens, 2008).…”
Section: Explanationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…My characterization of the nature of asymptotic idealization will, as a consequence, be compatible with any of a number of views about idealization's scientific role: the pragmatic view, my irrelevancesignaling view, and many others.2 I will introduce asymptotic idealization by contrasting it with what I 2. For a great deal more on idealization and various approaches to understanding its role in explanation and elsewhere, see McMullin (1985); Weisberg (2007);Elgin (2007);Potochnik (2017). will call simple idealization. Because asymptotic idealization is characterized with reference to the process by which an idealized model is created-that is, some sort of limiting process-it will be illuminating to offer a procedural characterization of simple idealization too, identifying it not so much by the structure of the end product, a certain deliberately misrepresenting model, but by the way in which the structure is derived.…”
Section: Simple Idealizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most explanations in science are highly idealized and might capture certain aspects of a causal pattern in a distorted way, but might capture other aspects of the pattern very well. In addition, two contradictory but highly idealized explanations can at the same time increase our understanding of a specific process . These benefits can also be realized when proposing a Lamarckian mechanism, that is, a use/disuse paradigm for certain processes of inheritance.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, two contradictory but highly idealized explanations can at the same time increase our understanding of a specific process. [10] These benefits can also be realized when proposing a Lamarckian mechanism, that is, a use/disuse paradigm for certain processes of inheritance. Use/disuse captures several aspects of IDSA and RNAi inheritance very well.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%