1988
DOI: 10.1017/s0305004100065658
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Idealizations of maximal Buchsbaum modules over a Buchsbaum ring

Abstract: Throughout this paper A denotes a Noetherian local ring with maximal ideal m and M denotes a finitely generated A-module. Moreover stands for the ith local cohomology functor with respect to m (cf. [10]). We refer to [15] for unexplained terminolog.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…IV], this system is extended to the required one immediately, cf. see also [Y1,Remark (5) a 1 , a 2 , . .…”
Section: Lemma (41) There Exist Systems Of Elements Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…IV], this system is extended to the required one immediately, cf. see also [Y1,Remark (5) a 1 , a 2 , . .…”
Section: Lemma (41) There Exist Systems Of Elements Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though the injectivity of ( 4.3) is coming from similar arguments as in the proof of [Y1,Theorem 4.1], we shall here discuss it quickly for reader's convenience. Via…”
Section: Proof Of Theorem (11)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the Rees algebra R is Buchsbaum by Theorem 1.1. For instance, if A possesses the canonical module K A and if the idealization A K A is a Buchsbaum ring, then by [Y1,Theorem 3.3] the -primary ideal = satisfies the equality 2 = . On the other hand, according to [CP,Theorem 2.2], if A is a Cohen-Macaulay local ring which is not a regular local ring, the -primary ideal = satisfies the equality 2 = .…”
Section: Proofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, the assertion (2.2) (resp. (2.4)) is given in the same way as in the proof of [Y,Lemma 1.2] (resp. [G2, Corollary(1.2)]), and see also [GY,Theorem (2.3) and Theorem (2.6)] for more explicit statements.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%