1990
DOI: 10.1080/00927879008824043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ideals of generic minors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
32
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
2
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the particular case of the determinant, Corollary 13 can be strengthened to say that the number of monomials of degree at most (n − k + ) with an increasing sequence of length (n − k) is not just a lower bound but is exactly equal to dim( ∂ =k (Det n ) ≤ ). This follows from the following powerful result on Gröbner bases of determinantal ideals which has been proved independently by Narasimhan [Nar86], Sturmfels [Stu90] and Caniglia, Guccione and Guccione [CGG90].…”
Section: Proofs Of Binomial Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In the particular case of the determinant, Corollary 13 can be strengthened to say that the number of monomials of degree at most (n − k + ) with an increasing sequence of length (n − k) is not just a lower bound but is exactly equal to dim( ∂ =k (Det n ) ≤ ). This follows from the following powerful result on Gröbner bases of determinantal ideals which has been proved independently by Narasimhan [Nar86], Sturmfels [Stu90] and Caniglia, Guccione and Guccione [CGG90].…”
Section: Proofs Of Binomial Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…They are used in treatments of questions about Cohen-Macaulayness, rational singularities, multiplicity, dimension, a-invariants, and divisor class groups; see [CGG90], [Stu90]…”
Section: Ladder Determinantal Idealsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The determinantal result was proved independently by Caniglia et al (1990), Narasimhan (1986) and Sturmfels (1990).…”
Section: A Gröbner Basismentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Their properties turn out to be very different from those of the much better understood determinantal ideals. For example, we prove that the generating permanents of P 2 (M ) are not a Gröbner basis of P 2 (M ) in any diagonal order, whereas Narasimhan (1986), Caniglia et al (1990), and Sturmfels (1990) proved independently that the generating (2 × 2)-minors of M are a Gröbner basis of the ideal they generate in any diagonal order. Also, in contrast to determinantal ideals, we prove that if m and n are both at least 3, then P 2 (M ) is not a radical ideal, is not Cohen-Macaulay, and there are minimal primes of distinct heights over it.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%