Ideals of rationality in dialogic

Woods, John

doi:10.1007/bf00128982

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

1993

2013

Publication Types

Select...

Article4

Other1

Book1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent6

Authors

Journals

Cited by 6 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 19 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Woods has highlighted another problem concerning the rationality of dialogue games, different from ours, which is related to the problem of logical omniscience[20]. Walton also sketches some problems of rationality in dialogues[19].…”

mentioning

confidence: 90%

Toward a structure theory for Lorenzen dialogue games

Alama¹

2013

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Lorenzen dialogues provide a two-player game formalism that can characterize a variety of logics: each set S of rules for such a game determines a set D(S) of formulas for which one of the players (the socalled Proponent) has a winning strategy, and the set D(S) can coincide with various logics, such as intuitionistic, classical, modal, connexive, and relevance logics. But the standard sets of rules employed for these games are often logically opaque and can involve subtle interactions among each other. Moreover, D(S) can vary in unexpected ways with S; small changes in S, even logically well-motivated ones, can make D(S) logically unusual. We pose the problem of providing a structure theory that could explain how D(S) varies with S, and in particular, when D(S) is closed under modus ponens (and thus constitutes at least a minimal kind of logic).

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 90%