Ideas for a Regulatory Definition of FinTech

Abstract

In this paper we evolve possible approaches of FinTech legal definition, investigate existing approaches at the international level and examine the policies applied at the national levels. Document analysis, as a form of qualitative research, was used in this study. Findings: We found that in most countries the legislation does not specifically address fintech companies, and the legal framework equally regulates the activities of traditional service providers and fintech operators. In our opinion, no specific legislation for FinTech companies needed, each type of activity provided by a financial or technology company is subject to a specific legislation/regulation with primary focus on services and products provided as payments, insurance, investments etc. Practical Implications: The term FinTech is freely used by policy makers, regulators, companies, researchers, academics and the public, both nationally and internationally. According to international organizations such as the IMF, the World Bank and the OECD, FinTech offers the opportunity to accelerate economic growth and expand financial affordability/inclusion in all countries. Some countries are increasingly striving to become global or international regional hubs for FinTech and are working hard to develop interagency government strategies with a supportive legal environment. Originality/Value: There is still confusion about the nature and dynamics of FinTech among politicians, scientists and practitioners, as well as about the legal framework of this area. The value of this article is to clarify and propose an apprach to definition of FinTech by combining different approaches in a very original and innovative way.

The effects of perceived value dimensions on customer satisfaction and loyalty: a comparison between traditional banks and fintechs

“…Studies on fintechs have focused on analyzes of their adoption (Boot et al ., 2021; Jünger and Mietzner, 2020; Sandhu and Arora, 2020; Singh et al ., 2020; Son et al ., 2020), regulatory environment issues (Gerlach and Rugilo, 2019; Rupeika-Apoga and Thalassinos, 2020) or even on the potential impact of fintechs on the dynamics of the banking sector and traditional banks (Phan et al ., 2020; Wang et al ., 2021). However, there is a gap in the literature regarding the comparison between traditional and fintech banks, regarding the effect of perceived value dimensions on customer satisfaction and loyalty, with these different business models.…”

Moving Beyond Silo Thinking: A Deductive Analysis of Financial Literacy, Financial Inclusion, FinTech, and the UN Sustainable Development Goals

“…The term FinTech, along with Citigroup's involvement in the emerging Smart Card Forum, was intended to signify a new strategic approach for the company and emphasize its openness. Despite almost three decades since its inception, the term has been understood in various ways (Allen, Gu, & Jagtiani, 2020;Rupeika-Apoga & Thalassinos, 2020;Elsinger, Fessler, Feyrer, Richter, Silgoner, & Timel, 2018;Schindler, 2017). Different perspectives have emerged, emphasizing either a technology-oriented focus, a functional-oriented focus, or a combination of both (Treu, 2022a(Treu, , 2022b(Treu, , 2021.…”

The Fintech Sensation - What is it about?

“…Although nearly 30 years have passed since the term was first mentioned, it is understood in different ways (Schindler, 2018;Elsinger et al, 2018;Rupeika-Apoga & Thalassinos, 2020;Allen et al, 2020). For example, market participants and regulators use different terms for the same activity or the same term for different activities.…”