2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.automatica.2014.10.091
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifiability and convergence analysis of the MINLIP estimator

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(20 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We note that the convergence analysis as presented in Dai et al (2015) is still valid, since this one only uses the geometry of the constraints. These are exactly the same in MINLIP * as in MINLIP.…”
Section: Monotone Wiener Systemsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We note that the convergence analysis as presented in Dai et al (2015) is still valid, since this one only uses the geometry of the constraints. These are exactly the same in MINLIP * as in MINLIP.…”
Section: Monotone Wiener Systemsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Note that those functions are often not invertible, so that the 'inverse approach' of rephrasing the Wiener ID task as (simpler) Hammerstein ID problem is not feasable. Practical issues Ahmed et al (2013) as well as theoretical properties of MINLIP are investigated and published on in some detail, see Dai et al (2015). Formally, the model becomes…”
Section: Monotone Wiener Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations