2008
DOI: 10.1080/01969720802039594
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifiability in Causal Bayesian Networks: A Gentle Introduction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These state that an effect is independent of its non-effects, given its direct causes and that the conditional independencies in the graph are equivalent to those in its probability distribution (see Druzdzel & Simon, 1993;Spirtes et al, 2000;Neapolitan, 2004;Huang & Valtorta, 2006;Valtorta & Huang, 2008 for more on these assumptions). It turns out that there are and these can be identified by a property known as d-separation, which is a purely graphical test, that is, a test that can be implemented by performing a search on a graph.…”
Section: Bayesian Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These state that an effect is independent of its non-effects, given its direct causes and that the conditional independencies in the graph are equivalent to those in its probability distribution (see Druzdzel & Simon, 1993;Spirtes et al, 2000;Neapolitan, 2004;Huang & Valtorta, 2006;Valtorta & Huang, 2008 for more on these assumptions). It turns out that there are and these can be identified by a property known as d-separation, which is a purely graphical test, that is, a test that can be implemented by performing a search on a graph.…”
Section: Bayesian Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, if it is assumed that in a Bayesian network, an arc from x to y means that x is a direct cause of y , then at least one of a number of causal assumptions is being made, such as the causal Markov assumption or the causal faithfulness assumption. These state that an effect is independent of its non-effects, given its direct causes and that the conditional independencies in the graph are equivalent to those in its probability distribution (see Druzdzel & Simon, 1993; Spirtes et al ., 2000; Neapolitan, 2004; Huang & Valtorta, 2006; Valtorta & Huang, 2008 for more on these assumptions). If this is the case, then this Bayesian network is capturing knowledge in a succinct way that is immediately obvious to humans, yet also with a well-understood formalism underlying the operations that can be performed.…”
Section: Introduction To Bayesian Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The algorithm is sound and complete even when the algorithm is used in a general causal graph, which has been proved by Huang and Valtorta. A similar result was provided by Shpitser and Pearl [17,22].…”
Section: Identification Of Causal-effect In Causal Bnssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…In the next chapter, we present the definitions and notations and lemmas used to support identify algorithms in this thesis. In chapter 3, three systematic procedures (identify causal effect of T on S, conditional causal effects of T [17].…”
Section: Definition (Atomic Intervention Do (T = T))mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation