2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11071-016-2768-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification and adaptive control of history dependent unsteady aerodynamics for a flapping insect wing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this paper, we have derived an explicit bound for the error of approximation for certain history dependent operators that are used in construction of robotic FDE's in [35] and this paper. The numerical simulations presented validate our results.…”
Section: Results and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In this paper, we have derived an explicit bound for the error of approximation for certain history dependent operators that are used in construction of robotic FDE's in [35] and this paper. The numerical simulations presented validate our results.…”
Section: Results and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the characteristics that has inspired the approach here is the history dependence of the aerodynamic lift and drag functions. We refer the interested reader to [35] to study this phenomena in detail. Although CFD methods are advantages in several aspects, they suffer from curse of dimensionality which makes them a very unfavorable choice for online control applications.…”
Section: History Dependent Operatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The advances in computational modeling and resulting aerodynamic understanding of complex flight phenomenon is directly aiding the development of robotic MAV systems ( Wood et al, 2013 ). There have been multiple attempts to create low-order models approximating more complex computational fluid dynamics (CFD) results, which could be implemented into various control schemes ( Amiralaei et al, 2012 ; Singh et al, 2004 ; Taha et al, 2014 ; Bayandor et al, 2013 ; Dadashi et al, 2016 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%