2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jasrep.2016.08.048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification and characterization of two new obsidian sub-sources in the Nemrut volcano (Eastern Anatolia, Turkey): The Sıcaksu and Kayacık obsidian

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Göllüdağ (Binder et al, 2011) and Nemrut Dağ (Robin et al, 2016) and elsewhere needs to be continued and developed alongside comprehensive documentation of the archaeological use of the obsidian from these sources. However, most sources remain less well known, and this particularly impacts our understanding of the more rarely used sources.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Göllüdağ (Binder et al, 2011) and Nemrut Dağ (Robin et al, 2016) and elsewhere needs to be continued and developed alongside comprehensive documentation of the archaeological use of the obsidian from these sources. However, most sources remain less well known, and this particularly impacts our understanding of the more rarely used sources.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our knowledge of specific source areas is still quite variable. Recent geological and geophysical surveys of Göllüdag (Binder et al, 2011), Nemrut Dağ (Robin et al, 2015;Robin et al, 2016), north-east Anatolia (Chataigner andGratuze 2014a, 2014b; see http://geobs.univ-rouen.fr/; Akköprü et al, 2017), Meydan Dağ and elsewhere by the McMaster Obsidian Procurement Expedition (see https://maxlab.mcmaster.ca/research-projects/mcmaster-obsidian-procurement-expedition-mope), as well as Biagi and Gratuze's survey of Paravani /Chikiani in Georgia (Biagi and Gratuze, 2016), demonstrate that the physical availability of obsidian as well as its elemental composition is often considerably more complicated than initially appreciated (cf., Shackley, 2008;Poupeau et al, 2005;Binder et al, 2011;Robin et al, 2016). In many cases, it is clear that the locations from which people obtained obsidian in the past were the geological outcrops themselves, as the quarry workshops at the Göllüdağ source indicate (Binder et al, 2011), but in other cases obsidian was probably mainly obtained from secondary sources such as river beds.…”
Section: The Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Confusion also arises from difficulties in the characterization of the sources, in both the Caucasus and the neighbouring regions. Geological studies are still underway: New outcrops have been identified only recently (e.g., Frahm et al 2017;Orange et al 2020), while others have been redefined (Chataigner et al 2014;Robin et al 2016). In particular, the numerous sources of eastern Anatolia present a high degree of complexity requiring further investigation.…”
Section: Obsidian Sourcing Studies In South-western Asiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1996, Poidevin 1998 ve jeokimyasal analizleri Renfrew vd. (1996) ve Gratuze (1998) Robin et al (2016).…”
Section: In This Study the Importance Of Volcanological And Geomorphunclassified