2014
DOI: 10.2460/javma.244.8.961
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification and effects of common errors and artifacts on the perceived quality of radiographs

Abstract: Results of this study suggested the technical variables proper exposure, proper positioning, absence of artifacts, and acquisition of all appropriate views were important for acquisition of sets of radiographs of high diagnostic quality. Identification of these errors and adjustment of radiographic technique to eliminate such errors would aid veterinarians in obtaining radiographs of high diagnostic quality and may reduce misinterpretation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Post acquisition processing and image adjustment allow the production of a visually acceptable radiograph over a large range of exposure values (Nuth et al . ) ( Fig ).…”
Section: Artefacts and Pitfallsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Post acquisition processing and image adjustment allow the production of a visually acceptable radiograph over a large range of exposure values (Nuth et al . ) ( Fig ).…”
Section: Artefacts and Pitfallsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Additionally, a radiograph needs to be centred and collimated to the region of interest, be appropriately positioned, correctly exposed and free of artefacts (Nuth et al . ). An artefact is described as a portion of an image that masks or mimics a clinical feature, impairs the image quality or obscures abnormalities (Oestman et al .…”
Section: What Constitutes a ‘Good’ Radiograph?mentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations