2017
DOI: 10.5958/0975-6906.2018.00009.3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification and evaluation of Indian mustard genotypes for white rust resistance and agronomic performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ghasolia et al (2004) [4] reported the similar outcomes that the white rust disease incidence vary from place to place and time to time in different areas of Rajasthan and found diseaseincidence between 40-60% in some districts, 20-39% in other districts and less than 20% in other districts. Yadav et al (2018) [7] also found the similar results in survey that the disease intensity vary among all the surveyed areas and found in range of 19.76-32.79% in different areas of Madhya Pradesh. were grown, disease incidence was recorded and it was observed that the incidence of the diseasediffered across all of the surveyed areas because of the prevailing congenial environmental conditions and aggressive pathogen factors.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Ghasolia et al (2004) [4] reported the similar outcomes that the white rust disease incidence vary from place to place and time to time in different areas of Rajasthan and found diseaseincidence between 40-60% in some districts, 20-39% in other districts and less than 20% in other districts. Yadav et al (2018) [7] also found the similar results in survey that the disease intensity vary among all the surveyed areas and found in range of 19.76-32.79% in different areas of Madhya Pradesh. were grown, disease incidence was recorded and it was observed that the incidence of the diseasediffered across all of the surveyed areas because of the prevailing congenial environmental conditions and aggressive pathogen factors.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Likewise, five genotypes, including BEC-144, Heera and BIO YSR of B. juncea were found highly resistant at true leaf stage under field conditions [32]. Similarly, Yadav et al [33] reported 27 Indian mustard germplasm accessions with resistance reaction at Hisar, Ludhiana and Pantnagar under field conditions and eight of them were identified as highly resistant to "Delhi isolate" of A. candida at both cotyledonary and true leaf stages under artificial conditions. In the present study, four genotypes (PDZ-1, PDZ-4, PDZ-5, EC-399299) were resistant at true leaf stage under field conditions but were susceptible at cotyledonary stage under controlled conditions, highlighting that there is no chance for the seedlings to escape from the disease infection in controlled conditions where proper temperature and humidity were maintained, which is highly congenial for disease development.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Thus, they were better adapted to low nitrogen fertilizer conditions. In mustard germplasm with such a significant differences for traits plant height, number of branches per plant, number of siliques in main branch, 1000 seed weight, stover yield and seed yield might be due to the differences in their genetic background (Yadav et al 2018). On the other hand genetic and environment interaction also affect performance of accessions under various doses of nitrogen fertilizer (Khoshanazar et al 2000, Kolte et al 2000, Stringam et al 2000.…”
Section: Results and Disucussionmentioning
confidence: 99%