2007
DOI: 10.2305/iucn.ch.2006.pag.15.en
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification and gap analysis of key biodiversity areas: targets for comprehensive protected area systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
164
0
29

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 157 publications
(195 citation statements)
references
References 111 publications
2
164
0
29
Order By: Relevance
“…One of these indicators is the percentage of total national land surface legally under protection. The establishment of a 10% target for protected areas has become deeply entrenched in the thinking of many conservationists and incorporated into the national legislation of many countries for establishing protected areas (LANGHAMMER et al, 2007). A large number of marine protected areas (MPAs) have, therefore, been established around the world, in an attempt to halt further deterioration of sensitive habitats and populations, or to serve as fisheries management tools .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of these indicators is the percentage of total national land surface legally under protection. The establishment of a 10% target for protected areas has become deeply entrenched in the thinking of many conservationists and incorporated into the national legislation of many countries for establishing protected areas (LANGHAMMER et al, 2007). A large number of marine protected areas (MPAs) have, therefore, been established around the world, in an attempt to halt further deterioration of sensitive habitats and populations, or to serve as fisheries management tools .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of KBAs has been in use for some time (Eken et al 2004;Langhammer et al 2007), and widely employed in a number of geographical regions (e.g., Eken et al 2004;Gerlach 2008;Kasecker et al 2009;Paese et al 2010;Melovski et al 2012) and ecological zones such as freshwater ecosystems (Holland et al 2012;Carrizo et al 2014). However, a fully standardised methodology for their identification, based on a single set of criteria for all organism groups with strict quantitative thresholds-the KBA Standardhas only recently been launched .…”
Section: Alignment Of Ipa Criteria To Iucn Key Biodiversity Areasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This information is a base resource to assist in the prioritization of sites that contribute significantly to the global persistence of biodiversity at both regional and international levels, such as Key Biodiversity Areas (Langhammer et al 2007) and Alliance for Zero Extinction sites (Ricketts et al 2005). In addition, this information can guide decision makers in future development and environmental planning.…”
Section: Application Of Project Outputsmentioning
confidence: 99%