“…These results are lower than other studies addressing the prevalence of M. bovis in Iraq, Mhmood and Rhaymah, [14] and Hamad et al [15] who were mentioned that the popularity of M. bovis in calves in Mosul city were 76.09% and 86.5% using i-ELISA test and PCR techniques, respectively. There are several studies that have detected the prevalence of M. bovis in cattle in various countries, including Turkey, was 23.3% using direct fluorescent antibody testing (DFAT) [27], In Iran, was 88% using the nested PCR (n-PCR) technique [28], in Jordan, was 27.3% using conventional PCR (c-PCR) technique [29], in Saudi Arabia, was 24% using c-PCR technique [30], in China, was 48.7% using i-ELSA [31], in Egypt, was 67.5% and 8.3%, using culture method and c-PCR technique respectively [32,33], in Sudan, was 7.2% using i-ELISA test [34], in Algeria, was 69.0% and 58.0% using i-ELISA test and Real time PCR technique respectively [35], in United States of America, was 100% and 87.5% using LAMP and real-time PCR (RT-PCR) technique respectively [36], in Brazil, was 91.4%, 1.1% and 62.3% using (IHC), RT-PCR technique, and i-ELISA test respectively [1,37,38], and in Australia, was 42.5% using i-ELISA test [39]. The differs in the prevalence of M. bovis among counties may be due to different management approaches, environmental conditions, efficient diagnostic techniques, types of samples that were tested, and the presence or absence of additional factors, such as the host's age, physical characteristics, and immunological status.…”