2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10658-012-9993-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification and incidence of Iris yellow spot virus in Allium field crops in Southwest Germany

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
6
0
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
6
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This has been shown in the case of onion, where its distribution of the virus in the plant is heterogenous, which can give false negatives, leading to an underestimation of its incidence (Hsu et al, 2010). On the other hand, the symptoms caused by the IYSV do not tend to be consistent and clear, therefore, when taking plant tissue samples for their analysis with RT-PCR and/or DAS-ELISA results may be inconsistent (Krauthausen et al, 2012). This expression of symptoms is influenced by the period of incubation, the phenology of the plant at the moment of infection, weather conditions, the level of stress in the plant, as well as in the cultivar (Bag et al, 2012).Likewise, Ochoa et al (1996) point out that obtaining negative samples in weeds does not imply that they are not a reservoir for the virus.…”
Section: Cuadro 2 Colonias De Trips Colectadas En Diferentes Especiementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This has been shown in the case of onion, where its distribution of the virus in the plant is heterogenous, which can give false negatives, leading to an underestimation of its incidence (Hsu et al, 2010). On the other hand, the symptoms caused by the IYSV do not tend to be consistent and clear, therefore, when taking plant tissue samples for their analysis with RT-PCR and/or DAS-ELISA results may be inconsistent (Krauthausen et al, 2012). This expression of symptoms is influenced by the period of incubation, the phenology of the plant at the moment of infection, weather conditions, the level of stress in the plant, as well as in the cultivar (Bag et al, 2012).Likewise, Ochoa et al (1996) point out that obtaining negative samples in weeds does not imply that they are not a reservoir for the virus.…”
Section: Cuadro 2 Colonias De Trips Colectadas En Diferentes Especiementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Esto se ha demostrado en el caso de la cebolla, donde su distribución del virus en la planta es heterogénea lo que puede dar falsos negativos tendiendo a subestimar su incidencia (Hsu et al, 2010). Por otro lado, los síntomas ocasionados por IYSV no suelen ser consistentes y claros, por lo que al momento de tomar muestras de tejido vegetal para su análisis por RT-PCR y/o DAS-ELISA pueden tenerse resultados inconsistentes (Krauthausen et al, 2012). Dicha expresión de síntomas es influenciado por el período de incubación, la fenología de las plantas al momento de la infección, las condiciones climáticas, nivel de estrés en la planta así como del cultivar (Bag et al, 2012).…”
Section: Cuadro 2 Colonias De Trips Colectadas En Diferentes Especieunclassified
“…Six samples tested positive by RT-PCR, although; were ELISA negative. Uncertain diagnosis based on leaf symptoms and discrepancies between ELISA and RT-PCR results were reported previously (Krauthausen et al 2012). Moreover, the distribution of IYSV throughout an infected plant is uneven (Kritzman et al 2001;Smith et al 2006) and thus the pieces of tissue used for ELISA and RT-PCR may contain differential virus titer, even when extracted from the same plant.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Similarly, Krauthausen and collaborators (2012) reported no amplification for some samples with this primer pair at 60°C annealing temperature. Therefore, samples were tested with two additional primer pairs: IYSV-837/Tos-R15 ( U g a a n d Ts u d a 2 0 0 5 ) a n d J J -2 3 2 f / J J -6 9 2 r (Krauthausen et al 2012); and 14 and 13 samples were positive, respectively. In total, 89% (16/18) of the samples were confirmed to be IYSV-positive with one or (Table 1).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation