Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
AimsTo explore the care experiences of informal carers of people with chronic conditions in hospitals and identify areas for improvement in the context of comprehensive care delivery.DesignA explanatory sequential mixed‐method study.MethodsThis study was conducted, involving a survey with 182 carers and interviews with 31 carers of individuals who attended an Australian hospital. Descriptive analysis of quantitative data was performed using RStudio, while thematic analysis of qualitative data was conducted using NVivo.ResultsThe findings revealed seven overarching components of care that influenced carers' hospital experiences and their perceptions of care quality. Areas requiring improvement were identified within these categories.ConclusionThis review identifies common perspectives of informal carers of people with chronic conditions in hospital settings and highlights important areas that require attention to improve carers' hospital care experiences. Carers should be welcomed, involved, informed and supported during hospital attendance to foster the most positive care experiences.ImplicationsHealthcare professionals should involve carers in assessment, shared decision‐making and the care process and recognise and address carers' needs.ImpactThe findings revealed the carer's hospital experiences in the context of comprehensive care delivery and identified areas requiring improvement.Reporting MethodThe CROSS and the COREQ guidelines were followed.Patient or Public ContributionThe study protocol was presented to stakeholders from two hospitals in Australia, a Patient and Carer Advisory Board (attached to the parent project: evaluating Quality of Care (eQC)) and the Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care, and discussions were held to assess the relevance and significance of this study to clinical practice and health policy.
AimsTo explore the care experiences of informal carers of people with chronic conditions in hospitals and identify areas for improvement in the context of comprehensive care delivery.DesignA explanatory sequential mixed‐method study.MethodsThis study was conducted, involving a survey with 182 carers and interviews with 31 carers of individuals who attended an Australian hospital. Descriptive analysis of quantitative data was performed using RStudio, while thematic analysis of qualitative data was conducted using NVivo.ResultsThe findings revealed seven overarching components of care that influenced carers' hospital experiences and their perceptions of care quality. Areas requiring improvement were identified within these categories.ConclusionThis review identifies common perspectives of informal carers of people with chronic conditions in hospital settings and highlights important areas that require attention to improve carers' hospital care experiences. Carers should be welcomed, involved, informed and supported during hospital attendance to foster the most positive care experiences.ImplicationsHealthcare professionals should involve carers in assessment, shared decision‐making and the care process and recognise and address carers' needs.ImpactThe findings revealed the carer's hospital experiences in the context of comprehensive care delivery and identified areas requiring improvement.Reporting MethodThe CROSS and the COREQ guidelines were followed.Patient or Public ContributionThe study protocol was presented to stakeholders from two hospitals in Australia, a Patient and Carer Advisory Board (attached to the parent project: evaluating Quality of Care (eQC)) and the Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care, and discussions were held to assess the relevance and significance of this study to clinical practice and health policy.
Importance: Although many hospitals universally screen their patients for functional mobility and activity impairment, there is no common method to do this for cognitive impairment. Establishing an interdisciplinary and standardized process to screen for cognitive impairment is essential for early identification of impairments, optimization of patients’ function, and safe discharge planning. Previously, the reliability and validity of the Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care Applied Cognitive Inpatient Short Form “6-Clicks” (AM-PAC ACISF) were measured among occupational therapy practitioners and speech-language pathologists; however, its reliability among other team members, specifically nurses, is unknown. This study reports the interprofessional interrater reliability of the AM-PAC ACISF in the acute care hospital setting. Objective: To examine the nursing–therapist interrater reliability of the AM-PAC ACISF in the acute care hospital setting. Design: A prospective study using a convenience sample. Setting: Acute care hospital. Participants: Fifty adult patients, six nurses, five occupational therapy practitioners, and one speech-language pathologist. Outcomes and Measures: Interrater reliability for the AM-PAC ACISF among therapists and nurses. Results: Interrater reliability was good among nurses and therapists, with an intraclass correlation coefficient of .88 (95% confidence interval [.79, .93]) for the AM-PAC ACISF. Conclusions and Relevance: Findings suggest that the AM-PAC ACISF is reliable for use among interdisciplinary teams, helps to establish a common language for early identification of cognitive impairment, and can be used for guiding clinical discussions around patient cognition in the acute care setting. Plain-Language Summary: Having an interdisciplinary and standardized process to screen patients early for cognitive impairment is essential for identifying impairments, optimizing patients’ function, and facilitating safe discharge planning in the acute care setting. Early identification of cognitive impairment by the interdisciplinary team can also allow for timely occupational therapy and other rehabilitation service interventions. The findings of this study suggest that the Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care Applied Cognitive Inpatient Short Form “6-Clicks” (AM-PAC ACISF) can reliably be used by interdisciplinary teams, establishes a common language for early identification of cognitive impairment, and can be used for guiding clinical discussions around patient cognition in the acute care setting.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.