2011 Fourth International Conference on Intelligent Computation Technology and Automation 2011
DOI: 10.1109/icicta.2011.316
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification and Location of Picking Tomatoes Based on Machine Vision

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Apart from bruise detection, yield estimation, and disease identification, algorithms are also shown in maturity evaluation and acquisition of crop segmentation. In maturity evaluation, both a Fuzzy model [62] and medium filter algorithm [85] are employed for 3108 images on banana samples and 100 images on tomato samples with an average identification rate of 93.11%, and within 89% to 98%, respectively. The Fuzzy model is useful in handling ambiguous information for the banana fruit maturity detection using red-green-blue (RGB) components.…”
Section: Optics and Photonics Applications In Agriculturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from bruise detection, yield estimation, and disease identification, algorithms are also shown in maturity evaluation and acquisition of crop segmentation. In maturity evaluation, both a Fuzzy model [62] and medium filter algorithm [85] are employed for 3108 images on banana samples and 100 images on tomato samples with an average identification rate of 93.11%, and within 89% to 98%, respectively. The Fuzzy model is useful in handling ambiguous information for the banana fruit maturity detection using red-green-blue (RGB) components.…”
Section: Optics and Photonics Applications In Agriculturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 (2017) pp. [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36] cases (Figure8(a)). PLS Regression gave the minimum RMSE of 0.218 and maximum correlation coefficient (R p ) of 0.855 for FOS features set (Figure 8(a)) followed by 0.869 for GLCM feature set (Figure 8(b)).…”
Section: Firmness Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Until date, MV has been widely applied to solve various agricultural problems, ranging from simple quality evaluation [17,18] to complex robot-steered applications [19][20][21]. Consumers on the other hand, grade quality of food products in a fuzzy way according to their senses such as sight, touch, smell etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%