2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2014.03.056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification and optimization of indolo[2,3-c]quinoline inhibitors of IRAK4

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
33
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Treatment with 5 µM IRAK1/4 inhibitor results in decreased proliferation of SEM cells, but not REH cells (Figure 4A). To avoid potential off-target effects of the IRAK1/4 inhibitor, we also used a second inhibitor named IRAK4 inhibitor compound 26, which was characterized as a more specific inhibitor of IRAK4 (Tumey et al, 2014). Treatment with 500 nM of this IRAK4 inhibitor led to an even greater inhibition of SEM cell proliferation and decreased cell viability with no detectable effect on the REH cells (Figure 4B).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Treatment with 5 µM IRAK1/4 inhibitor results in decreased proliferation of SEM cells, but not REH cells (Figure 4A). To avoid potential off-target effects of the IRAK1/4 inhibitor, we also used a second inhibitor named IRAK4 inhibitor compound 26, which was characterized as a more specific inhibitor of IRAK4 (Tumey et al, 2014). Treatment with 500 nM of this IRAK4 inhibitor led to an even greater inhibition of SEM cell proliferation and decreased cell viability with no detectable effect on the REH cells (Figure 4B).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To measure the potential of IRAK inhibitors as first-line treatment, we initiated the injection of the animals with IRAK inhibitors on day 19 after transplantation, just before they succumb to leukemia. Intraperitoneal injection with IRAK1/4 inhibitor (8 mg/kg), IRAK4 inhibitor (75 mg/kg) (Tumey et al, 2014) or vehicle was performed every other day for 10 days. At sacrifice, the leukemia was confirmed by enlarged spleen, liver weights, elevated white blood cell counts (Figure S7C–E), and histological analysis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to the scaffolding function of IRAK4, which is essential for canonical signaling pathways such as NF-kB, the kinase function of IRAK4 appears to play a minor role in canonical TLR pathways, but rather controls a subset of TLR-induced genes in a monocyte-specific way, possibly through mRNA stabilization (44,(55)(56)(57)(58). Still, inhibition of IRAK4 kinase activity in monocytes results in strongly reduced cytokine production (55,57), and an increasing number of chemically diverse, selective kinase inhibitors have been developed, several of which demonstrated in vivo efficacy in proofof-principle models (59)(60)(61)(62)(63)(64)(65)(66)(67)(68). Although most IRAK4 inhibitors showed in vivo PK properties requiring further improvement, a very recently published compound, Pf-06650833, showed remarkable in vivo potency (2.4 nM IC 50 on R848-induced peripheral blood mononuclear cells) and selectivity and has been moved forward to clinical studies (69).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Potency loss was also observed for 27 and 28 compared with 18 and 19, albeit to a lesser extent. It was generally observed that the CHF 2 analogues offered higher intrinsic IRAK4 potency and comparable membrane permeability compared with the corresponding CF 3 analogues, as seen with (1R,2S)-cyclohexane-1,2-diamine, (1R,2S)-2-hydroxycyclohexylamine, and piperazine groups on the pyrazolopyrimidine ring (18,19,25,26,27, and 28 in Table 4). …”
mentioning
confidence: 95%