2014
DOI: 10.1007/s12517-014-1348-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification and petrophysical evaluation of thinly bedded low-resistivity pay reservoir in the Niger Delta

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These may result in inaccurate assessment of reservoir compartmentalization which could cause ambiguity in estimating gross rock volume and hydrocarbon volume (Shepherd 2009). However, all the estimated petrophysical parameters are in line with those reported by other researchers in Niger Delta (Adeoye and Enikanselu 2009;Opara 2010;Mode et al 2014); they formed the essential parameters to quantitatively determine the stock tank oil initially in place (STOIIP) in the field.…”
Section: Petrophysical Evaluationsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…These may result in inaccurate assessment of reservoir compartmentalization which could cause ambiguity in estimating gross rock volume and hydrocarbon volume (Shepherd 2009). However, all the estimated petrophysical parameters are in line with those reported by other researchers in Niger Delta (Adeoye and Enikanselu 2009;Opara 2010;Mode et al 2014); they formed the essential parameters to quantitatively determine the stock tank oil initially in place (STOIIP) in the field.…”
Section: Petrophysical Evaluationsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The excavation effect of neutron logging is an important feature of gas layer identification. The difference between the neutron and density porosities (φDN ${\varphi }_{D-N}$) is often used as an indicator to identify the gas layers 5,29 …”
Section: Identification Of Low‐resistivity Gas Layer In the He 8 Sect...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to different conductive mechanisms, low resistivity in hydrocarbon reservoirs can be caused by two reasons: additional conductivity caused by skeletal components and additional conductivity caused by fluid in the pores 1–3 . Additional conductivity of skeletal components includes clay mineral conductivity, 4 heavy mineral conductivity, and argillaceous lamina or thin interlayer conductivity 5,6 . Additional conductivity caused by pore fluid can be attributed to high irreducible water saturation due to a complex pore structure, 7–9 high salinity drilling mud invasion, 10 relatively high salinity of formation water, 11 and high in‐wall‐bound water content caused by strongly hydrophilic particles and rocks 12 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Carrying out the research on logging interpretation and evaluation method of resistivity low-contrast oil pays has become the most practical choice to supplement conventional oil resources and reduce oilfield exploration cost 1 , 2 , 27 . The resistivity low-contrast oil pay has the characteristics of little difference in porosity and resistivity logging response from water layer, and the oil saturation of resistivity low-contrast oil layer is relatively low 3 , 4 . At present, low porosity and low permeability reservoirs represented by tight sandstone has become the main battlefield to ensure the supply of oil and gas resources 5 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%