2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2014.03.041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification and prediction of cyclic fatigue behaviour in sandwich panels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This corresponds to a rapid initial loss of mechanical properties during the first 100 cycles, followed by a progressive evolution of the damage mechanisms. This behaviour is commonly observed for sandwich structures with GFRP skins and foam cores [40,41]. It is worth noticing that whatever the loading ratio, the beams tested with d ¼ 110 mm present a higher degradation rate and fail earlier than beams tested with a span length d ¼ 250 mm.…”
Section: Fatigue Behaviourmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…This corresponds to a rapid initial loss of mechanical properties during the first 100 cycles, followed by a progressive evolution of the damage mechanisms. This behaviour is commonly observed for sandwich structures with GFRP skins and foam cores [40,41]. It is worth noticing that whatever the loading ratio, the beams tested with d ¼ 110 mm present a higher degradation rate and fail earlier than beams tested with a span length d ¼ 250 mm.…”
Section: Fatigue Behaviourmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…The normalised stiffness variation with the number of cycles, evaluated for the fatigue tests at σ max =640 MPa for the CFRP panels with R/ 1FS and 5CNBR-NP/ R matrices is shown in Figure 6. In general, materials exhibit stiffness reduction with fatigue cycles [13,14]. It may be noted that the initial stiffness reduction for both samples is significant, however, rate of this reduction was slightly higher for the CFRP panel with 5CNBR-NP/ R matrix.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Honeycomb structures are most commonly used in sandwich composites as well as in many other industrial products because of high energy absorbing capability, high strength/stiffness, and strength/ weight ratios [18][19][20]. Honeycombs act in a different way under dynamic load in terms of failure modes and carry high fatigue life [21][22][23]. Engineered wood elements can be developed in honeycomb structures to reduce the consumption of wood products with maintaining the structural capacity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%