Identification and prioritization of tumour-associated antigens for immunotherapeutic and diagnostic capacity in epithelial ovarian cancer: a systematic literature review

Abstract

Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is a prevalent carcinoma in the female population associated with poor prognostic outcomes, in part due to the late stage of disease at diagnoses. Aiming to identify tumor associated antigens (TAAs) with the potential to facilitate earlier detection and targeted therapy of EOC, five scientific literature repositories were systemically searched for primary literature sources reporting the expression of a TAA in the tissue or serum of adult females diagnosed with EOC and healthy women. We identified 7,120 articles of which 32 met our inclusion criteria and passed the bias-quality assessment. Subsequently data were collated on 29 TAAs whose expression had been analyzed in 2,181 patients and 589 healthy individuals. Reports of CA125 and EpCAM expression were numerous while tissue expression data were available for 28 TAAs. Data were segregated into three meta-cohorts for statistical scrutiny and their capacity for diagnostic and treatment targeting assessed. We showed that CA-125 was expressed homogenously in EOC patients while EpCAM was expressed heterogeneously. CA-125 was the most promising TAA target for both diagnosis and treatment, gaining a priority score of 12 (/12) while EpCAM gained a priority score of seven. Tissue expression of EOC TAAs was homogenous; 90% of the EOC population express any identified TAA while just 3% of healthy individuals will be positive for the same TAA. We suggest TAA profiling should be a fundamental aspect of EOC diagnosis, sitting alongside the FIGO framework, promoting reduced mortality and directing development of TAA targeted therapeutics.

Nomogram based on the O-RADS for predicting the malignancy risk of adnexal masses with complex ultrasound morphology

“…CA125 is the most widely used tumor biomarker for screening and monitoring epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) [28]. However, it has always been controversial in clinical practice due to the high false-positive and false-negative rates.…”