2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10337-015-2921-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification and Quantification of Aconitines and Colchicine in Serum, Urine, and Plants using MonoSpin C18 and LC-MSMS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To compare our results with other studies [ 5 , 6 , 26 ], the validation data in the previous studies were listed in Table S4, where common analytes among the previous studies and the present study were shown. To compare the results appropriately, the validation data for almost the same QC concentration were extracted.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To compare our results with other studies [ 5 , 6 , 26 ], the validation data in the previous studies were listed in Table S4, where common analytes among the previous studies and the present study were shown. To compare the results appropriately, the validation data for almost the same QC concentration were extracted.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…These quantitative values are almost the same as the mean maximum concentration (6.0 ± 3.4 ng/mL) of colchicine in plasma obtained from 20 male volunteers, ingested a single 2.0-mg colchicine tablet on the pharmacokinetic study [ 37 ]. Furthermore, Saito et al reported that the serum concentration of colchicine in an actual poisoning case was 6.1 ng/mL [ 26 ]. Additionally, Abe et al reported that the colchicine concentration in patient plasma in a fatal case of colchicine self-poisoning was 60 ng/mL [ 38 ], remarkably higher than the LLOQ level of our method.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering these mentioned facts, the rapid and sensitive detection of colchicine from a variety of samples is of profound significance in the pharmaceutical, clinical, food, and breeding industries. To date, there have been many analytical methods developed for the detection of colchicine, like thin layer chromatography–densitometer, HPLC using UV or MS detection, liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry, and electrochemical analysis, , but these methods are generally time-consuming, expensive, and cumbersome. Therefore, it is necessary and urgent to find a highly efficient and sensitive method to detect colchicine.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%