2014
DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2014.881531
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification and Trust in Public Organizations: A communicative approach

Abstract: Little empirical research has examined the link between organizational identification and organizational trust. Identification presupposes a level of consistency in its object, and this study proposes that trust can reduce uncertainty between organization and employee, enabling a bond between the two to form. Secondly, this research looks at how interaction with various organizational groups may affect organizational trust, thereby indirectly encouraging identification. It is thus proposed that organizational … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
31
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…One factor that has long been associated with high levels of role clarity is the communication climate of the organization (Rizzo et al, 1970). Campbell and Im (2015) point out that communication in bureaucratic organizations flows along several different channels, and demonstrate how trust in the organization is dependent jointly on interaction quality with senior leaders, supervisors, and work group members (numerous studies provide additional empirical support for this position; Brunetto, Farr-Wharton, & Shacklock, 2011; Deeter-Schmelz, 1997). Other studies also suggest that both vertical collaboration (i.e., collaboration between individuals and their superiors) and horizontal collaboration (between work group members of a similar rank)—a key component of which is communication intensity—may also influence organizational performance (Whitford, Lee, Yun, & Jung, 2010) and, in an example pertinent to the present study, role ambiguity (Campbell, 2016).…”
Section: Principal Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One factor that has long been associated with high levels of role clarity is the communication climate of the organization (Rizzo et al, 1970). Campbell and Im (2015) point out that communication in bureaucratic organizations flows along several different channels, and demonstrate how trust in the organization is dependent jointly on interaction quality with senior leaders, supervisors, and work group members (numerous studies provide additional empirical support for this position; Brunetto, Farr-Wharton, & Shacklock, 2011; Deeter-Schmelz, 1997). Other studies also suggest that both vertical collaboration (i.e., collaboration between individuals and their superiors) and horizontal collaboration (between work group members of a similar rank)—a key component of which is communication intensity—may also influence organizational performance (Whitford, Lee, Yun, & Jung, 2010) and, in an example pertinent to the present study, role ambiguity (Campbell, 2016).…”
Section: Principal Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bireylerin örgüt ile özdeşleşmelerini sağlamak için örgütsel güvenin önemli bir faktör olduğu görülmüştür (Choi ve Kim, 2011:244;Öktem, Kızıltan ve Öztoprak, 2016:163;Campbell ve Im, 2014:1076Biçkes ve Yılmaz, 2017:301). Ancak otel işletmelerinde örgütsel güven ile örgütsel özdeşleşme etkileşimi yeterince incelenmemiştir.…”
Section: öRgütsel öZdeşleşmeunclassified
“…Moreover, the type of over-identification thought to undermine the questioning of authority and organizational processes should be the edge case rather than the norm, and thus be operative only in the extreme. Second, the level of risk involved in pursuing CO-OCB implies the relevance of organizational trust, a construct closely linked to OI (Campbell & Im, 2014; Restubog, Hornsey, Bordia, & Esposo, 2008; Rousseau, Sitkin, Burt, & Camerer, 1998). As such, the same trust that may undermine the necessary critical evaluations of extant organizational processes may also be a necessary condition for employees to address them through CO-OCB.…”
Section: Literature and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%