2017 14th International Conference on Electrical Engineering, Computing Science and Automatic Control (CCE) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/iceee.2017.8108829
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification-based linear control of a twin rotor MIMO system via dynamical neural networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, a drawback of this approach is that it requires process inputs to be persistently exciting. This constraint is inadequate for ill conditioned multivariable processes because in this case model order can be underestimated, leading to subsequent identification of poor models (Misra and Nikolaou, 2003;Haider et al, 2011;Musoff and Zarchan, 2009;DeBitetto, 1989;Ehrman and Lanterman, 2008;Palmer et al, 1996;Woo-han et al, 2006;Armenta et al, 2017;Chandra et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a drawback of this approach is that it requires process inputs to be persistently exciting. This constraint is inadequate for ill conditioned multivariable processes because in this case model order can be underestimated, leading to subsequent identification of poor models (Misra and Nikolaou, 2003;Haider et al, 2011;Musoff and Zarchan, 2009;DeBitetto, 1989;Ehrman and Lanterman, 2008;Palmer et al, 1996;Woo-han et al, 2006;Armenta et al, 2017;Chandra et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jagannath et al (2017), introduction of PID control for the design of pitch and yaw angle of the system which stabilize the main and tail rotor and give better transient response. Carlos et al (2017), worked on realtime implementation and stabilization scheme and tracking control of pitch and yaw-angle of the system. Vrazevsky et al (2016), proposed their work on PID control with suboptimal controller LQR for good response of the system to achieve the better steady state response.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once a RHONN is properly trained, controller design for a given purpose (stabilization, trajectory tracking) based on the identification model should be carried out; once the control law structure is found, the plant states are used instead of the RHONN ones as they are assumed to be known. 1 In prior literature, for simplicity, linear control techniques have been applied to RHONN models at the cost of losing important characteristics (Armenta et al 2017); nonlinear control, on the other hand, has been applied via model inversion (Sanchez and Bernal 2000) and sliding modes (Castañeda et al 2013), but these approaches cancel out the RHONN nonlinearities instead of using them appropriately. Recently, a solution for implementing nonlinear control to a RHONN in the form of parallel distributed compensation (PDC) (Wang et al 1996) has appeared in (Armenta et al 2019); a Takagi-Sugeno (TS) model allowing design conditions in the form of linear matrix inequalities (LMIs) (Boyd et al 1994) and sum-of-squares (SOS) (Prajna et al 2004) has been obtained via a suitable transformation of the RHONN.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%