2011
DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.110393
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification by families of pediatric adverse events and near misses overlooked by health care providers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
62
0
4

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
62
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…36 Prior studies using active patient and family reporting similarly found that 23% to 49% of patients and families reported safety concerns. 16,17,19 These studies used various methods, including post discharge patient telephone interviews, 16 computer-based safety-reporting parent discharge surveys, 17 and in-person patient/caregiver interviews 2 to 3 times per week. 19 An important difference between our study and these is that we subsequently validated family safety reporting using a rigorous 2-step methodology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…36 Prior studies using active patient and family reporting similarly found that 23% to 49% of patients and families reported safety concerns. 16,17,19 These studies used various methods, including post discharge patient telephone interviews, 16 computer-based safety-reporting parent discharge surveys, 17 and in-person patient/caregiver interviews 2 to 3 times per week. 19 An important difference between our study and these is that we subsequently validated family safety reporting using a rigorous 2-step methodology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19,20 Our error and preventable AE rates were lower than patient-reported AE rates found in 2 adult studies, which detected AEs in 23% of patients 18 and 8.8 per 100 admissions, 20 respectively, and are likewise lower than a Canadian pediatric study that found 28.1 errors and AEs per 100 admissions. 23 It is unclear whether differences in reported rates are due to differences in data collection methods, patient populations, or true differences in AE and error rates across institutions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 A few adult studies have found that patients identify numerous verified errors and AEs not otherwise documented in the medical record. [18][19][20] Pediatric data on patient and family involvement in error and AE detection are limited [21][22][23][24] but similarly suggest that families often report verified errors and AEs that are not detected through other sources. 23 Given the family's central role in pediatrics, parent-reported errors may be a fruitful source of error and AE surveillance for hospitalized children and may provide lessons regarding the utility of family error reporting in other populations.…”
Section: Main Outcomes and Measures-medical Errors And Preventable Aesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Yet the one source of experience and expertise that remains largely ignored is that of the patient. 1 In their study in this issue of CMAJ of reporting of adverse events, Daniels and colleagues 2 show that parents of children undergoing care in hospital can provide timely and important information about the safety of care that complements information recorded in staff reporting systems. Information from fam ilies revealed many harmful and potentially harmful events that would have otherwise remained undetected.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%