“…Such large studies have enriched the statistical power needed to capture common variants with much lower effect sizes and population frequencies. To date, GWASs conducted for breast cancer have identified more than 80 breast cancer susceptibility loci [Easton et al, 2007b;Hunter et al, 2007;Stacey et al, 2007Stacey et al, , 2008Gold et al, 2008;Ahmed et al, 2009;Thomas et al, 2009;Zheng et al, 2009;Gaudet et al, 2010;Long et al, 2010Long et al, , 2012Turnbull et al, 2010;Cai et al, 2011;Fletcher et al, 2011;Haiman et al, 2011;Sehrawat et al, 2011;Ghoussaini et al, 2012;Kim et al, 2012;Bojesen et al, 2013;Couch et al, 2013;French et al, 2013;Garcia-Closas et al, 2013;Michailidou et al, 2013;Sapkota et al, 2013c], and many more studies are underway. Motivated by the huge success of breast cancer GWAS, few studies have also been conducted to identify SNPs associated with breast cancer outcomes and other associated sub-phenotypes [Garcia-Closas et al, 2008;Azzato et al, 2010a, b;Shu et al, 2012;Rafiq et al, 2013].…”