2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmps.2013.01.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of a cohesive zone model from digital images at the micron-scale

Abstract: International audienceWe present a new methodology for the identification of a zone cohesive model that describes material failure. The material under consideration fails by crazing. The study is conducted at the micron scale in order to capture and analyze the fracture mechanism. The crack tip displacement fields are measured optically by Digital Image Correlation. The local stress intensity factors (model I and II) and the location of the equivalent elastic crack tip are calculated during the loading. The va… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…PMMA fails by crazing (Döll 1983;SaadGouider et al 2006) and its failure mechanism can be determined from inverse analysis (Elices et al 2002) or crack tip field analysis (Réthoré and Estevez 2013). However, a brittle cracking model was used for simulating this matrix failure in the current study.…”
Section: Damage Models and Materials Definitionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…PMMA fails by crazing (Döll 1983;SaadGouider et al 2006) and its failure mechanism can be determined from inverse analysis (Elices et al 2002) or crack tip field analysis (Réthoré and Estevez 2013). However, a brittle cracking model was used for simulating this matrix failure in the current study.…”
Section: Damage Models and Materials Definitionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…To measure displacements/strains over a period of time, in situ DIC is the only option [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31]. In situ high resolution deformation measurements (0.1 to 10 μm per image pixel) may be carried out when coupled with optical microscopy [26][27][28][29][30][31]; whilst ultra-high resolution measurements (10-100 nm per image pixel) may be obtained when performed within a SEM [24,25,29,[32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40]. Currently, in situ DIC coupled with an optical microscope can provide sufficiently high-resolution in both spatial and temporal deformation measurements, making it a preferred choice for fatigue crack growth studies, as opposed to more sophisticated techniques and specialised apparatus required in SEM-DIC or Synchrotron X-ray setups.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a more robust approach relies on the concept of an elastic crack tip and its detection using the first super‐singular term of the Williams' expansion . This approach reveals to be robust with respect to a non‐linear process zone due to plasticity , diffuse damage , or cohesive fracture . It has been shown to be robust enough for real time detection of crack propagation for load shedding in fatigue crack propagation experiments .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%