2010
DOI: 10.1007/s12206-010-0119-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of a crack in a beam by the boundary element method

Abstract: A method to detect a crack in a beam is presented. The crack is not modeled as a massless rotational spring, and the forward problem is solved for the natural frequencies using the boundary element method. The inverse problem is solved iteratively for the crack location and the crack size by the Newton-Raphson method. The present crack identification procedure is applied to the simulation cases which use the experimentally measured natural frequencies as inputs, and the detected crack parameters are in good ag… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many authors have determined natural frequencies of mode shapes of bending vibration for the cracked beam to identify the crack. [8][9][10][11][12] A crack is represented by rotational spring in the beam to model the jump in slope caused by the local flexibility at the crack location, and in case of no crack, the local flexibility is zero or rotational spring stiffness is infinity. 13 Sayyad and Kumar 14 carried out theoretical and experimental vibration analysis for cracked simply supported beam.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many authors have determined natural frequencies of mode shapes of bending vibration for the cracked beam to identify the crack. [8][9][10][11][12] A crack is represented by rotational spring in the beam to model the jump in slope caused by the local flexibility at the crack location, and in case of no crack, the local flexibility is zero or rotational spring stiffness is infinity. 13 Sayyad and Kumar 14 carried out theoretical and experimental vibration analysis for cracked simply supported beam.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are two main fields in damage detection. One field is applying the dynamic wave to the structures to compare the differences between healthy and nonhealthy structures [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. The other field is the identification of defects by using static response [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22], that is applying directional loading to the structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…beforehand, at that point, a structure is harmed, or complexities in the harm levels or ranges [7].The crack detection technique depends on the way that an enclosed crack in an empty area brings mutual vibration amongst bending and longitudinal vibrations [8], and in this way, an additional resonant peak appears in the FRF (frequency response function) of the beam with a crack. This strategy is able to detect the presence of cracks, however, it is hard to anticipate the location parameters and depth of the crack particularly while numerous cracks exist [9]. All together for identifying the parameters of the crack precisely through this methodology, initially a cracked-beam component is created for the cracked beams with express portrayals of the crack parameters, including the seriousness of the crack and its relative area inside a component [10,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%