2012
DOI: 10.1021/jm2017072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of a Crucial Amino Acid in the Helix Position 6.51 of Human Tachykinin Neurokinin 1 and 3 Receptors Contributing to the Insurmountable Mode of Antagonism by Dual NK1/NK3 Antagonists

Abstract: The neurokinins are neuropeptides that elicit their effect through three GPCRs called NK(1), NK(2), and NK(3). Compounds 5 and 6 are dual hNK(1) (K(i) of 0.7 and 0.3 nM) and hNK(3) (K(i) of 2.9 and 1.7 nM) antagonists. Both compounds exhibit an insurmountable mode of antagonism at hNK(1), whereas at hNK(3), they differ in that 5 is an insurmountable but 6 a surmountable antagonist. Using homology modeling and site-directed mutagenesis, hNK(1)-Phe264 and hNK(3)-Tyr315 were found to be the molecular determinants… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, 15 residues are involved in the binding of aprepitant, of which 10 are highly conserved across the neurokinin receptor subfamily (Supplementary Figure 6). However, the key residue F264 6.51 , which, to our knowledge, is not known to be involved in the ligand binding of NK1R, is presented as tyrosine in NK2R and NK3R 33 . In the NK1R structure, the residue F264 6.51 forms a strong edge–π interaction with the bis-trifluomethyl-phenyl ring of aprepitant, and the substitution of the phenyl group with the phenolic group may disrupt the interaction and cause a spatial clash with the ligand.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Overall, 15 residues are involved in the binding of aprepitant, of which 10 are highly conserved across the neurokinin receptor subfamily (Supplementary Figure 6). However, the key residue F264 6.51 , which, to our knowledge, is not known to be involved in the ligand binding of NK1R, is presented as tyrosine in NK2R and NK3R 33 . In the NK1R structure, the residue F264 6.51 forms a strong edge–π interaction with the bis-trifluomethyl-phenyl ring of aprepitant, and the substitution of the phenyl group with the phenolic group may disrupt the interaction and cause a spatial clash with the ligand.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…While selective NKR antagonists in clinical trials had rather disappointing outcomes, new hopes are now given to dual and/or triple NKR ligands for the treatment of diverse pathologies. , We therefore aimed to develop a set of models combining NK 1 R, NK 2 R, and NK 3 R activity, which was able to identify the majority of NKR-active compounds from our literature data set and at the same time finds as few decoys as possible. A way to achieve this goal is the generation of various models, the hit lists of which are complementary to each other .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The unsatisfactory results of subtype receptor-selective compounds in clinical trials shifted the research efforts toward nonselective NKR antagonists favoring the antagonism of more than one NKR in accordance with the activity profiles of the endogenous ligands SP, NKA, and NKB. For example, targeting the treatment of schizophrenia, Hoffmann–La Roche proceeded to investigate dual NK 1 R-/NK 3 R-antagonists, while Novartis 2011 concentrated on the development of compounds binding to all three receptors …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%