1986
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.34.7192
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of a defect in a semiconductor:EL2 in GaAs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

4
48
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 241 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
4
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We whish only to underline here that the most plausible microscopic model of EL2 which does seem to account for much of what is known experimentally is that of von Bardeleben et al [65,66] [18] proposed that EL2 appears at the stage IV of annealing between 400 and 500 °C during which clusters of native defects created by heavy particle irradiation dissociate and migrate to form more stable forms. In fact, these authors cannot detect EL2 directly after ion implantation because their material becomes highly resistive due to the large doses used and the DLTS measurements cannot give valuable informations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We whish only to underline here that the most plausible microscopic model of EL2 which does seem to account for much of what is known experimentally is that of von Bardeleben et al [65,66] [18] proposed that EL2 appears at the stage IV of annealing between 400 and 500 °C during which clusters of native defects created by heavy particle irradiation dissociate and migrate to form more stable forms. In fact, these authors cannot detect EL2 directly after ion implantation because their material becomes highly resistive due to the large doses used and the DLTS measurements cannot give valuable informations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using this theory for fast electron irradiated n-GaAs, they have attributed the observed high-temperature DLTS peaks (E4 and E5) to defect pairs each including the EL2 midgap donor (Asoa or AsGa + X) together with one of the acceptors (E2 and E3 respectively) which are both related to (VAs -Asi) [14]. Each [65,66]. 5) EL2 is not the AsGa isolated antisite and it is a more complex defect involving AsGa as a core : AsGa + Asi [65,66].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It was believed that the intricacy of a defect complex was required to achieve more than one configuration 180 yielding a local minimum in energy. Thus it was proposed that an ASGa plus an Asi at two interatomic distances from the ASGa formed the EL2 detect (Von Bardeleben, et al 1985, Von Bardeleben, et al 1986). This model is supported by the results of optically detected EPR and ENDOR measurements (Meyer, et al 1986).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%