2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2012.07285.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of a high risk gastric cancer group using serum pepsinogen after successful eradication of Helicobacter pylori

Abstract: In the identification of a high risk group for gastric cancer, we suggest that the optimal cut-off value of PGI/II after successful eradication of H. pylori is 4.5. PGI/II ≤ 4.5 in post-eradication includes more gastric cancer cases compared with the traditional PG method, and 75% of gastric cancer cases detected after eradication.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Haneda et al . [ 92 ] suggested that the optimal cutoff value of PG I/II in posteradication is 4.5, including more gastric cancer cases compared with the traditional PG method. All in all, the prognosis improvement of gastric cancer depends on the early detection and diagnosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Haneda et al . [ 92 ] suggested that the optimal cutoff value of PG I/II in posteradication is 4.5, including more gastric cancer cases compared with the traditional PG method. All in all, the prognosis improvement of gastric cancer depends on the early detection and diagnosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Haneda et al 19 reported that a serum PG I/II ratio ≤ 4.5 is a useful cutoff to select those at risk for gastric cancer after eradication of H. pylori. The sensitivity of this cutoff value for the development of gastric cancer after eradication of H. pylori was reported to be 65.9%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, we demonstrated that the probability of open gastric atrophy could be estimated by serum PG I/II ratio measured after eradication of H. pylori. Usually, the optimal cutoff value is set to select the subjects at highest gastric cancer risk [19][20][21] . However, there are some patients who could not be selected based on the cutoff value.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However PG values and ratios change after H. pylori eradication[ 73 ], and the usefulness of the PG method in H. pylori- eradicated patients was not evident. Haneda et al[ 62 ]. examined PG levels in post-eradication cases with and without gastric cancer, and found that the optimal cut-off value for the PGI/II ratio was 4.5 (instead of the usual 3.0).…”
Section: Predictors Of Primary Gastric Cancer After H Pylomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If there is little change in the metaplasia after eradication, then assessment of histology after eradication may be used as a substitute, but this would need to be evaluated by independent studies. Risk stratification by pepsinogen levels after eradication has been reported[ 62 ], but further validation studies are necessary. Some researchers have focused on endoscopic changes after H. pylori eradication that was accompanied with cancer[ 74 ].…”
Section: Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%