1992
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.89.1.6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of a macrophage-binding determinant on lipophosphoglycan from Leishmania major promastigotes.

Abstract: Leishmania are obligatory intracellular parasites in mammalian macrophages that gain entry by receptormediated phagocytosis. Their major cell surface glycoconjugate, lipophosphoglycan (LPG), has been implicated in this process. A monoclonal antibody specific for Leishmania major LPG (WIC 79.3), which has been shown to block promastigote attachment to macrophages, was used to identify a macrophage-binding determinant of LPG. WIC 79.3 bound exclusively to the phosphorylated repeats of LPG and not to the sacchari… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
54
0
1

Year Published

1992
1992
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
54
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been proposed that the difference between L. major and L. donovani in the induction of initial immune responses is accounted for partly by variation in the surface molecules of these Leishmania species, such as the phosphoglycan structure of LPG and by the interaction of such species-specific molecules with tissue macrophages or various cells present at the site of infection (13,38). Further, various reports suggest that the L. major-specific poly-␤-galactosyl epitopes are implicated in the progression of immune responses against Leishmania infections (13,39,40,42,54), although the host receptors/lectins have remained unclarified. As our data in this and the previous paper (16) suggest that galectin-3 and galectin-9 can distinguish L. major from L. donovani, galectin-3 and 9 are two such host factors, which can be implicated in the species-specific tropism of the disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It has been proposed that the difference between L. major and L. donovani in the induction of initial immune responses is accounted for partly by variation in the surface molecules of these Leishmania species, such as the phosphoglycan structure of LPG and by the interaction of such species-specific molecules with tissue macrophages or various cells present at the site of infection (13,38). Further, various reports suggest that the L. major-specific poly-␤-galactosyl epitopes are implicated in the progression of immune responses against Leishmania infections (13,39,40,42,54), although the host receptors/lectins have remained unclarified. As our data in this and the previous paper (16) suggest that galectin-3 and galectin-9 can distinguish L. major from L. donovani, galectin-3 and 9 are two such host factors, which can be implicated in the species-specific tropism of the disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1) (36 -38). Interestingly, the L. major-specific polygalactosyl epitope is implicated in two stages of the Leishmania life cycle: the host-pathogen interactions (39,40) and the attachment of Leishmania to its sand fly vector (41,42). It is likely that such roles of the polygalactosyl epitopes are mediated by ␤-galactoside-binding proteins such as galectins.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study is restricted to a comparison of the mAb reactivity with lipophosphoglycan of known structure and the use of chemical or enzymic degradation procedures and, therefore, provides only a first categorization of the epitope structure. A next step would be to use defined fragments derived from the natural antigens or by synthesis [5, 521. The evidence provided for the assignment of the epitopes for class AI, A111 mAbs and for WIC70.3 [52] and Klon 3.8 (group AIV mAbs) is relatively clear. mAb WIC 108.3 is a highly promiscuous antibody reacting with lipophosphoglycan isolated from at least three species (compare also Table 2); however, our experiments suggest that it has high preference for L. major lipophosphoglycan.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All three monoclonal antibodies showed mutual quantitative competition for binding sites on L. major lipophosphoglycan and recognized repetitive epitopes as could be shown by twosite-ELISA (data not shown). By analogy to WIC79.3, which has been shown to recognize repeats with terminating p1,3-linked Gal residues specific for this species [52], it is proposed that WIC108.3 and Klon3.8 prefentially react with these L. major-specific modifications. However, the crossreaction of WIC108.3 with L. mexicana and L. donovani lipophosphoglycan suggests that this mAb also recognizes pl,3Glc-substituted and unsubstituted repeats, albeit with decreasing affinity, as indicated by a much lower sensitivity of a two-site ELISA.…”
Section: Antibody Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation