2005
DOI: 10.1093/jac/dki319
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of a new antitubercular drug candidate, SQ109, from a combinatorial library of 1,2-ethylenediamines

Abstract: Compound SQ109 with an MIC of 0.7-1.56 microM (H37Rv, Erdman and drug-resistant strains of M. tuberculosis), an SI of 16.7 and 99% inhibition activity against intracellular bacteria, demonstrated potency in vivo and limited toxicity in vitro and in vivo, and was selected for further development.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
248
0
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 349 publications
(252 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
248
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The comparison between the intracellular activity of compound SCAR05 and rifampin (Table 4) showed a higher activity in the new compound. Additionally, the intracellular activities of compounds SCAR01-05 are better than those of 26 synthesized compounds from a combinatorial library of 1,2-ethylenediamines, and comparable to SQ 109 (4.72 mM ¼ 99% intracellular inhibition), (2)eRueP (1) 99.25(9) which is the best compound in this library [27]. On the other hand, the compound SCAR06 showed low intracellular activity at 1.29 mM (19.40%), compared to the similar compound SCAR01, with 55.10%…”
Section: In Vitro Infection Modelmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The comparison between the intracellular activity of compound SCAR05 and rifampin (Table 4) showed a higher activity in the new compound. Additionally, the intracellular activities of compounds SCAR01-05 are better than those of 26 synthesized compounds from a combinatorial library of 1,2-ethylenediamines, and comparable to SQ 109 (4.72 mM ¼ 99% intracellular inhibition), (2)eRueP (1) 99.25(9) which is the best compound in this library [27]. On the other hand, the compound SCAR06 showed low intracellular activity at 1.29 mM (19.40%), compared to the similar compound SCAR01, with 55.10%…”
Section: In Vitro Infection Modelmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The MICs of complexes SCAR01-05 are comparable to or better than those of some "second" and "first" line drugs used in current therapy [6,25,26]. SQ 109, an antitubercular compound derived from ethambutol, with MIC of 1.56 mM [27], and TMC 207, a diarylquinoline with MIC of 0.81 mM [28], both of which are new promising drug candidates, presently in the human clinical trial phase, are examples of in vitro activity comparable to the ruthenium complexes presented here. Even though the complex SCAR06 showed the worst inhibitory result among the tested compounds, it had activity comparable to or better than the "second" line drugs [25].…”
Section: Anti-m Tuberculosis Activity Assaymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Therapy is lengthy, even with drug-sensitive strains, and requires combination therapies with four drugs. Two recent TB drugs/drug leads (9)(10)(11) are TMC207 [bedaquiline (1); Sirturo] and SQ109 (2) (Fig. 1).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…42,43 sQ109 SQ109 is a 1,2-ethylenediamine that was derived from the pharmacophore of ethambutol. 44 However, SQ109 has a distinct mechanism of action from ethambutol, and it maintains activity against ethambutol-resistant strains of M. tuberculosis. SQ109 exerts antimycobacterial activity by interfering with cell wall assembly by targeting the transport molecule MmpL3.…”
Section: Pretomanidmentioning
confidence: 99%