2011
DOI: 10.1124/mol.111.073825
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of a Novel Allosteric Binding Site in the CXCR2 Chemokine Receptor

Abstract: We have shown previously that different chemical classes of small-molecule antagonists of the human chemokine CXCR2 receptor interact with distinct binding sites of the receptor. Although an intracellular binding site for diarylurea CXCR2 antagonists, such as N-(2-bromophenyl)-NЈ-(7-cyano-1H-benzotriazol-4-yl)urea (SB265610), and thiazolopyrimidine compounds was recently mapped by mutagenesis studies, we now report on an imidazolylpyrimidine antagonist binding pocket in the transmembrane domain of CXCR2. Using… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
39
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, there are also examples of multiple allosteric sites on the same GPCR (Lazareno et al, 2002;de Kruijf et al, 2011;Noetzel et al, 2013;Zweemer et al, 2013), further highlighting the rich potential for allosteric targeting of this receptor family.…”
Section: B G Protein-coupled Receptorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, there are also examples of multiple allosteric sites on the same GPCR (Lazareno et al, 2002;de Kruijf et al, 2011;Noetzel et al, 2013;Zweemer et al, 2013), further highlighting the rich potential for allosteric targeting of this receptor family.…”
Section: B G Protein-coupled Receptorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…VUF11211 was docked into the model using GOLD v4 (Verdonk et al, 2003). Subsequently, protein-ligand interactions were optimized in Molecular Operating Environment by energy minimization, during which all heavy atoms were tethered with a 10.0 kcal/mol restraint, similar to the protocol our group recently described (de Kruijf et al, 2011). However, since the CXCR42IT1t template contains lipids protruding into protein between TM5 and TM6 and the C terminus blocking the extracellular opening (Roumen et al, 2012), the binding pocket of a CXCR3 model is spacious and VUF11211 cannot form an interaction with W268 6.48 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, since the CXCR42IT1t template contains lipids protruding into protein between TM5 and TM6 and the C terminus blocking the extracellular opening (Roumen et al, 2012), the binding pocket of a CXCR3 model is spacious and VUF11211 cannot form an interaction with W268 6.48 . To explain all site-directed mutagenesis data, the CXCR3 model was optimized within this region by moving TM6 by 2 Å closer to TM3 and TM5, followed by the same energy minimization protocol (de Kruijf et al, 2011). This resulted in a TM arrangement comparable to that of the aminergic receptors (Shimamura et al, 2011).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…36 For CXCR2, in particular, species-selective human small molecule antagonists have been observed, which cannot be studied in a rodent disease model. 37 Accordingly, primary human cell-based assay systems may be better suited to translate disease-relevant human biology into early drug discovery. The here-described actin reorganization assay on primary human neutrophils complies with this notion and will improve the decision making in CXCR1/2-directed pharmaceutical research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%