2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2020.09.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of a Novel Retrieval-dependent Memory Process in the Crab Neohelice granulata

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…"We argue that the [greatly reduced] involvement of the dlPFC in Day 2 extinction can distinguish the two paradigms." (p. 303) These findings add considerable weight to the conclusion from several earlier studies that the memory reconsolidation process and standard extinction are fundamentally different processes with different behavioral effects, memory encoding effects, brain region effects, and molecular cascade effects [20][21][22][23]36,39].…”
Section: A14 2018 Chen Et Al [61]: "Effects Of Prediction Error On Post-retrieval Extinction Of Fear To Compound Stimuli"supporting
confidence: 52%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…"We argue that the [greatly reduced] involvement of the dlPFC in Day 2 extinction can distinguish the two paradigms." (p. 303) These findings add considerable weight to the conclusion from several earlier studies that the memory reconsolidation process and standard extinction are fundamentally different processes with different behavioral effects, memory encoding effects, brain region effects, and molecular cascade effects [20][21][22][23]36,39].…”
Section: A14 2018 Chen Et Al [61]: "Effects Of Prediction Error On Post-retrieval Extinction Of Fear To Compound Stimuli"supporting
confidence: 52%
“…However, the actual functioning and effects of that series on Day 2, producing memory updating and annulment, differ fundamentally from standard extinction's behavioral effects, memory encoding effects, neural network engagement effects, and molecular cascade effects, as numerous studies have shown (reviewed by [46] (pp. [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23]; and again demonstrated recently by comparative fMRI imagining [63]). Many experimental results indicate that updating directly modifies the target memory [26], whereas extinction creates a separate memory that competes with the target memory [184].…”
Section: A1 2010 Schiller Et Al [7]: "Preventing the Return Of Fear In Humans Using Reconsolidation Update Mechanisms"mentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The appeal is clear: with a single memory reactivation followed by the one-time administration of an amnesic agent they offer the opportunity to target maladaptive memories, promising lower rates of relapse [ 3 ]. Research on fears acquired in the laboratory (i.e., conditioned fears) indicates that reconsolidation depends upon the learning history, including the age and strength of the targeted memory, where older and stronger memories are more resistant to reconsolidation [ 4 , 5 ], and the interaction between what has already been learned and what occurs during the reactivation procedure (e.g., refs. [ 6 , 7 ]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pavlovian fear-conditioning research in animals and humans has indicated that while prediction error is a necessary condition for reconsolidation, it is not sufficient. Instead, the amount of prediction error in the reactivation procedure is critical to which post-retrieval memory process occurs [ 21 ]: Reconsolidation occurs when prediction error is present but limited, extinction learning occurs when prediction error is extensive, and limbo—an insensitive state in between reconsolidation and extinction—occurs when the amount of prediction error is too high for reconsolidation and insufficient for extinction [ 5 , 7 , 22 ]. Note that, prediction error (or the quantity thereof) is not an independent quality of the reactivation procedure: it depends entirely upon how the experience at the reactivation procedure aligns with the learning history.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%