2012
DOI: 10.1038/onc.2012.122
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of a pivotal endocytosis motif in c-Met and selective modulation of HGF-dependent aggressiveness of cancer using the 16-mer endocytic peptide

Abstract: Since c-Met has an important role in the development of cancer, it is considered as an attractive target for cancer therapy. Although molecular mechanisms for oncogenic property of c-Met have been actively investigated, regulatory elements for c-Met endocytosis and its effect on c-Met signaling remain unclear. In this study, we identified a pivotal endocytic motif in c-Met and tested it for selective modulation of HGF-induced c-Met response. Using various chimeric constructs with the cytoplasmic tail of c-Met,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…HGF induced c-Met/CAV1 complex formation and enhanced co-localization of phosphorylated-c-Met with phosphorylated-CAV1, predominantly accumulated in the perinuclear region of cells. This data is consistent with the data reported by Cho et al [2012] that HGF induces the internalization of c-Met, which is co-localized with endocytic machinery members including CAV1 in 239E human embryonic kidney cell line [40]. They demonstrated that, CAV1 has a mediator function for c-Met trafficking to the perinuclear region towards signal promotion and inhibition of the association between endocytic machinery and c-Met inhibits HGF induced phosphorylation of MAPK and consequently reduces scattering and migration [40].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…HGF induced c-Met/CAV1 complex formation and enhanced co-localization of phosphorylated-c-Met with phosphorylated-CAV1, predominantly accumulated in the perinuclear region of cells. This data is consistent with the data reported by Cho et al [2012] that HGF induces the internalization of c-Met, which is co-localized with endocytic machinery members including CAV1 in 239E human embryonic kidney cell line [40]. They demonstrated that, CAV1 has a mediator function for c-Met trafficking to the perinuclear region towards signal promotion and inhibition of the association between endocytic machinery and c-Met inhibits HGF induced phosphorylation of MAPK and consequently reduces scattering and migration [40].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…This data is consistent with the data reported by Cho et al [2012] that HGF induces the internalization of c-Met, which is co-localized with endocytic machinery members including CAV1 in 239E human embryonic kidney cell line [40]. They demonstrated that, CAV1 has a mediator function for c-Met trafficking to the perinuclear region towards signal promotion and inhibition of the association between endocytic machinery and c-Met inhibits HGF induced phosphorylation of MAPK and consequently reduces scattering and migration [40]. Accumulation of CAV1 and activated c-Met in the perinuclear region suggested ligand-mediated receptor internalization.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Recent work indicated that Cav-1 is a molecular hub, integrating the transduction of multiple signals and acting as a stress-related oncotarget for drug resistance and metastasis [17] , [32] . Studies have demonstrated that Cav-1 can bind c-MET and regulate its endocytosis, and consequently its effects on downstream signaling [33] . Reciprocal activating cross talk between c-MET and Cav-1 was shown previously to promote migration, invasion, and branching morphogenesis in hepatocellular carcinoma [34] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, this activation mechanism was insensitive to the potent, active site-directed MET inhibitor PHA-665752. In fact, a fourth category of inhibitor, involving a peptide that interferes with the C-terminal docking site of MET and which has been shown to display greater inhibitory effect and toxicity tolerance than the MET inhibitor PHA-665752 (Cantelmo et al 2010;Cho et al 2013), becomes a more attractive strategy in this context. Considering the data presented here, it is possible that combinations of agents that block both liganddependent and ligand-independent activation of MET may be the most effective strategies for therapeutic intervention.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%