2020
DOI: 10.1155/2020/6657013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of a Prognostic Risk Signature of Kidney Renal Clear Cell Carcinoma Based on Regulating the Immune Response Pathway Exploration

Abstract: Purpose. To construct a survival model for predicting the prognosis of patients with kidney renal clear cell carcinoma (KIRC) based on gene expression related to immune response regulation. Materials and Methods. KIRC mRNA sequencing data and patient clinical data were downloaded from the TCGA database. The pathways and genes involved in the regulation of the immune response were identified from the GSEA database. A single factor Cox analysis was used to determine the association of mRNA in relation to patient… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

4
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
4
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to a regulatory network model of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transitions, the identified biomarkers are more compatible with mesenchymal than a more invasive hybrid phenotype [23,33]. Thus, our results agree with this idea, but also highlight the complexity and heterogenicity of cancer deregulations and their correlation with survival prognostics [7,25,27,34]. Moreover, our results from the models may be useful as clues for future studies that aim to understand the molecular mechanisms associated with cancer survival, finding therapeutical targets for specific cancers and therapy evaluation metrics.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to a regulatory network model of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transitions, the identified biomarkers are more compatible with mesenchymal than a more invasive hybrid phenotype [23,33]. Thus, our results agree with this idea, but also highlight the complexity and heterogenicity of cancer deregulations and their correlation with survival prognostics [7,25,27,34]. Moreover, our results from the models may be useful as clues for future studies that aim to understand the molecular mechanisms associated with cancer survival, finding therapeutical targets for specific cancers and therapy evaluation metrics.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Therefore, more studies should be conducted to clarify the potential of the platform AI algorithm as a generic "omics" to phenotype modelling solution. In comparison to other published ML models, our model, for breast cancer prognostics, performed with a superior sensitivity (86%) in comparison to the reported 35-64%, whereas its specificity was inferior (85%) to the 97-99% [25] urthermore, the obtained AUC for the breast cancer prognostic model (86%) was comparable with the 80-92% reported for other models [25] or the lung and renal cancer prognostic models, we obtained in this work slightly superior performances (up to 10%) in comparison to the ones published using other modelling approaches [26,27]. This suggests that our cancer prognostic models are competitive alternatives to the ones already published.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…According to a regulatory network model of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transitions, the identified biomarkers are more compatible with mesenchymal than a more invasive hybrid phenotype [24,34]. Thus, our results agrees with this idea, but also highlights the complexity and heterogenicity of cancer deregulations and its correlation with survival prognostics [7,26,28,35].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Besides, the obtained AUC for the breast cancer prognostic model (86%) was comparable to the 80-92% reported for other models [26]. For lung and renal cancer prognostic models, we obtained in this work slightly superior (up to 10%) in comparison to the ones published using other modelling approaches [27,28]. This suggests that our cancer prognostic models are competitive alternatives to the ones already published.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…In addition, in the past few decades, the construction of risk models around cancer-related biological processes or signaling pathway-related genes has succeeded [ 41 43 ]. Therefore, inspired by previous research, we used angiogenesis-related genes to construct a risk model for BRCA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%