1984
DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1984.141
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of a subpopulation of MeCCNU resistant cells in previously untreated Lewis lung tumours

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

1985
1985
1994
1994

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although inherently sensitive cells might be protected in kinetic, pharmacological or environmental sanctuaries, the apparent rarity of such sanctuaries makes this suggestion, to us, unlikely. Only 1 in 105 tumour cells are resistant according to the survival curve published in our previous paper (Stephens et al, 1984) and this is supported by growth delay data. The growth delays for wildtype and sensitive tumour lines treated with 25mg kg-I MeCCNU were 15 to 20 days (Table I) and assuming a 1 day doubling time for surviving cells, this translates into 5 to 6 decades of cell killing.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Although inherently sensitive cells might be protected in kinetic, pharmacological or environmental sanctuaries, the apparent rarity of such sanctuaries makes this suggestion, to us, unlikely. Only 1 in 105 tumour cells are resistant according to the survival curve published in our previous paper (Stephens et al, 1984) and this is supported by growth delay data. The growth delays for wildtype and sensitive tumour lines treated with 25mg kg-I MeCCNU were 15 to 20 days (Table I) and assuming a 1 day doubling time for surviving cells, this translates into 5 to 6 decades of cell killing.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…administration to mice of MeCCNU, CCNU, BCNU, cyclophosphamide (CY), melaphalan and cis-dichlorodiammine platinum (cis-Pt) have all been described in previous publications (Rose et al, 1980;Stephens et al, 1984).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The tumourbearing leg was passed through holes of known diameter in a perspex disc and the size of the tumour was taken to be the size of the largest hole through which the tumour would pass without resistance (Stephens et al, 1984). This size was converted into tumour weight by comparison with a calibration curve which was constructed by measuring a number of tumours, dissecting them out and weighing them.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%