2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.conengprac.2012.04.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of a Wiener–Hammerstein system using an incremental nonlinear optimisation technique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In ; Tan et al (2012), both the poles and zeros of the best transfer function are split in all possible ways between two linear subsystems to get the initial estimates for subsequent nonlinear optimizations. In the proposed state space method, only the poles are split between two linear subsystems and the parameters b 1 and c 2 are estimated by using the separable least-squares.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In ; Tan et al (2012), both the poles and zeros of the best transfer function are split in all possible ways between two linear subsystems to get the initial estimates for subsequent nonlinear optimizations. In the proposed state space method, only the poles are split between two linear subsystems and the parameters b 1 and c 2 are estimated by using the separable least-squares.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But, the benchmark session at SYSID 2009 (Schoukens, Suykens, & Ljung, 2008) has stimulated the interest in identification of Wiener-Hammerstein systems; see the Special Section in Control Engineering Practice (CEP) with nine papers (Wills & Ninness, 2012;Piroddi, Farina, & Lovera, 2012;Sjöberg, Lauwers, & Schoukens, 2012;Marconato, Sjöberg, & Schoukens, 2012;Paduart, Lauwers, Pintelon, & Schoukens, 2012;Tan, Wong, & Godfrey, 2012;Han & de Callafon, 2012;Lopes dos Santos, Ramos, & de Carvalho, 2012;Falck et al, 2012). Among others, in , Tan et al (2012), the transfer function of the best linear approximation of the Wiener-Hammerstein system is first obtained by least-squares or frequency domain methods. Then, the transfer function is divided into two subsystems to get the estimates for initialization and identification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many approaches use the BLA, or a similar correlation analysis, as a starting point for the algorithm e.g. (Billings & Fakhouri, 1978a;Billings, 1980;Westwick & Kearney, 2003;Crama & Schoukens, 2005;Lauwers, 2011;Tan et al, 2012;Westwick & Schoukens, 2012;Schoukens et al, 2014a;Vanbeylen, 2014;Tiels et al, , 2015Giordano & Sjöberg, 2015;Ase & Katayama, 2015;Katayama & Ase, 2016).…”
Section: Wiener-hammerstein Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Method/technique RMS (mV) Nonparametric BLA, QBLA [41] 0.278 44 Classification of poles and zeros using QBLA [42] 0.286 26 Fractional model parameterization [43] 0.295 26 Advanced method [44,45] 0.30 64 WH-EA (this paper) 0.306 26 Brute force method [45] 0.31 30 Scanning technique [46] 0.370 -Polynomial nonlinear state space [47] 0.42 797 Generalized Hammerstein-Wiener [48] 0.481 47 Incremental nonlinear optimization [49] 0.679 25 LS-SVMs [50] 4.070 -Biosocial culture [51] 8 Figure 16: Captured nonlinearity as a piecewise linear function with = 8 by WH-EA from the benchmark data. Notice that the nonlinear block characterization only needs 14 parameters since the first and last straight segments can be defined just with their angles.…”
Section: Wh-ea Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%