2017 IEEE 17th International Conference on Bioinformatics and Bioengineering (BIBE) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/bibe.2017.00-62
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of ADHD Cognitive Pattern Disturbances Using EEG and Wavelets Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In literature, many researchers have utilized different methods to analyze resting-state EEG (rsEEG) and time series recorded from an ADHD group and a control group. Authors [44,45] contributed to discovering the best indicator of attention for ADHD. They applied the wavelet decomposition method to obtain different frequency bands of EEG.…”
Section: Classification Of Eeg Signals For Adhdmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In literature, many researchers have utilized different methods to analyze resting-state EEG (rsEEG) and time series recorded from an ADHD group and a control group. Authors [44,45] contributed to discovering the best indicator of attention for ADHD. They applied the wavelet decomposition method to obtain different frequency bands of EEG.…”
Section: Classification Of Eeg Signals For Adhdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarity patients are asked to do some motor activity like to arrange the spoons and hand them over to their caretaker. Moreover, visual cues activity as colors, numbers, and animals, are identified to find out the attentive and cognitive capability [44].…”
Section: Assessment Of Cognitive Capabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study [31] compared cobalt level in urine sample, result proved that cobalt is not at all responsible for the presence of ADHD disorder. The study [32] uses EEG and wavelet analysis to construct a model which is capable to separate ADHD and non ADHD with 94.74% accuracy. The work [33] uses quantitative data to list students profiles, the profiles leads to identify where students finding difficult to linguistic, cognitive and environmental natures.…”
Section: Classification Of Applications Using Feature Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%