Identification of animal movement patterns using tri-axial magnetometry

Abstract

BackgroundAccelerometers are powerful sensors in many bio-logging devices, and are increasingly allowing researchers to investigate the performance, behaviour, energy expenditure and even state, of free-living animals. Another sensor commonly used in animal-attached loggers is the magnetometer, which has been primarily used in dead-reckoning or inertial measurement tags, but little outside that. We examine the potential of magnetometers for helping elucidate the behaviour of animals in a manner analogous to, but very different from, accelerometers. The particular responses of magnetometers to movement means that there are instances when they can resolve behaviours that are not easily perceived using accelerometers.MethodsWe calibrated the tri-axial magnetometer to rotations in each axis of movement and constructed 3-dimensional plots to inspect these stylised movements. Using the tri-axial data of Daily Diary tags, attached to individuals of number of animal species as they perform different behaviours, we used these 3-d plots to develop a framework with which tri-axial magnetometry data can be examined and introduce metrics that should help quantify movement and behaviour.ResultsTri-axial magnetometry data reveal patterns in movement at various scales of rotation that are not always evident in acceleration data. Some of these patterns may be obscure until visualised in 3D space as tri-axial spherical plots (m-spheres). A tag-fitted animal that rotates in heading while adopting a constant body attitude produces a ring of data around the pole of the m-sphere that we define as its Normal Operational Plane (NOP). Data that do not lie on this ring are created by postural rotations of the animal as it pitches and/or rolls. Consequently, stereotyped behaviours appear as specific trajectories on the sphere (m-prints), reflecting conserved sequences of postural changes (and/or angular velocities), which result from the precise relationship between body attitude and heading. This novel approach shows promise for helping researchers to identify and quantify behaviours in terms of animal body posture, including heading.ConclusionMagnetometer-based techniques and metrics can enhance our capacity to identify and examine animal behaviour, either as a technique used alone, or one that is complementary to tri-axial accelerometry.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s40462-017-0097-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Animal-borne behaviour classification for sheep (Dohne Merino) and Rhinoceros (Ceratotherium simum and Diceros bicornis)

“…The latter often employs high-resolution spatial and temporal information to analyse the behaviour of animals. Depending on the sensors used, aspects such as energy expenditure, behaviour, location, speed, heart rate and temperature are monitored [1][2][3][4][5].…”

The ability of magnetic field sensors to monitor feeding in three domestic herbivores

“…We note that advances in animal-attached technology is now enabling ever finer resolution of animal behaviour, including the incidence of biting in herbivores (Di Virgilio et al, 2018). It remains to be seen the extent to which enhanced consideration of jaw angle (perhaps vertically and horizontally using properly calibrated tri-axial magnetometers (Williams et al, 2017)) over time may provide cues as to vegetation type, and thereby a proper measure of rates of energy gain according to the landscape characteristics (Di Virgilio et al, 2018). Although this is important for farmed herbivores, it also has implications for studies on wild animals where GPS-type data may provide location and the IMASEN could reveal the details of vegetation choice (see Frank, Wallen & White, 2016 and references therein), not least because such choice informs ecologists about how it structures the plant community (De Vries et al, 2018).…”

Open‐source, low‐cost modular GPS collars for monitoring and tracking wildlife

“…While the estimated battery life is lower than many commercial GPS collars, which often state multi‐year battery lives, further improvements and efficiency changes in the programming may bring this up to competitive levels. Magnetometers have become commonly used in conjunction with accelerometers as they can assist with calibration and provide a wealth of added features for behavioural classification (Williams et al, ); they were not trialled in this device for space, weight and power reasons but would make an excellent complement to other such devices.…”