1978
DOI: 10.1038/274484a0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of ataxia telangiectasia heterozygotes, a cancer prone population

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
73
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 204 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
4
73
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many authors have reported a level of cell survival intermediate between that seen in normal and ATM homozygote cells, but, in other studies, some overlap or no statistically significant differences between normal and AT het cell types have been detected (Chen et al, 1978;Kinsella et al, 1982;Nagasawa et al, 1985;Weeks et al, 1991;West et al, 1995;Shigeta et al, 1999;Sun et al, 2002). Many of these studies have used a fibroblast-cloning assay, which requires the trypsinising and replating of treated cells, which may lead to additional cell death, particularly in radiationsensitive cell types.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many authors have reported a level of cell survival intermediate between that seen in normal and ATM homozygote cells, but, in other studies, some overlap or no statistically significant differences between normal and AT het cell types have been detected (Chen et al, 1978;Kinsella et al, 1982;Nagasawa et al, 1985;Weeks et al, 1991;West et al, 1995;Shigeta et al, 1999;Sun et al, 2002). Many of these studies have used a fibroblast-cloning assay, which requires the trypsinising and replating of treated cells, which may lead to additional cell death, particularly in radiationsensitive cell types.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…For instance, intermediate sensitivity to IR has been documented in cell lines from AT heterozygotes using the measurement of cell survival or chromosome damage induction as end points (Chen et al, 1978;Rosin and Ochs, 1986;Shiloh et al, 1986;Scott et al, 1996;Tchirkov et al, 1997;Neubauer et al, 2002). However, many such studies have characterised only cell lines carrying truncating mutations, and some variability in the cellular responses has been noted between different cell lines (Nagasawa et al, 1985;Shiloh et al, 1989;Pandita and Hittelman, 1994;Djuzenova et al, 1999).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hypersensitivity to ionizing radiation is observed in A-T patients exposed to therapeutic radiation (Goto et al, 1967;Morgan et al, 1968) and in cultured cells from these patients (Taylor et al, 1975;Chen et al, 1978). There is evidence that this radiosensitivity is due to passage of damaged cells through the cell cycle and to the eventual accumulation of these cells in G2/M where they die (Beamish and Lavin, 1994).…”
Section: Chk1 Increases Radioresistance In A-t Cells As Determined Bymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well established that cells with the mutated form of ATM are hypersensitive to ionizing radiation (Taylor et al, 1975;Chen et al, 1978). Accordingly, we investigated whether elimination of the ATM protein in control cells might lead to a radiosensitive phenotype.…”
Section: Increased Radiosensitivity In C3abr Cells After Atm Anti-senmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the cellular level A-T is characterized by chromosomal instability (Aurias et al, 1980), hypersensitivity to ionizing radiation (Chen et al, 1978;Taylor et al, 1975) and ine cient cell cycle checkpoint activation (Beamish and Lavin, 1994;Zampetti-Bossler and Scott, 1981). The exact cause of the radiosensitivity in A-T cells remains unknown but there is evidence that the rejoining of g-radiation-induced double strand breaks is slower in A-T ®broblasts (Coquerelle et al, 1987).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%